Why is there no regulation despite evidence that ultra-processed foods are hazardous to long-term health?

Non-communicable diseases (NCDs) have exceeded infectious diseases as a global health threat. This shift has occurred concurrently with changes to lifestyle and diet, of which the increased consumption of ultra-processed foods (UPFs) is particularly concerning. UPFs are defined by industrial processing of often cheaply sourced natural food and inclusion of non-nutritional additives such as azo-dye colourants, non-caloric sweeteners, emulsifiers and preservatives. They now account for approximately half of the caloric intake in many countries and notably by children. These products can compromise nutritional quality while promoting hedonistic hunger and disrupting the gut microbiota. Population studies are increasingly demonstrating an association between high UPF consumption and increased all-cause mortality, obesity, cardiovascular disease, cancer risk, mental health and neuro-behavioural disorders. While association studies cannot account for all potential confounding factors, triangulation through combining large-scale cohort studies with animal/<i>in vitro</i> models and human challenge studies provides more compelling evidence that UPFs increase the risks of NCDs. Despite the increasing evidence, regulatory action on their use has remained limited. We review the evidence and explore the reasons why effective regulation is lacking, with increasing examples of inappropriate food industry influence on political decisions in several countries. The current focus on reducing consumption of high fat, sugar and salt has distracted attention from the adverse effects of alternative non-nutritional additives. We propose changes to food labelling and call for public health interventions to combat and minimise UPF consumption. These interventions are especially vital for socioeconomically disadvantaged populations and children, who increasingly consume UPFs as attractive and cheaper alternatives to fresh or minimally processed products. Urgent action is needed to promote healthier dietary practices worldwide.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Future Healthcare Journal
Published
2026-01-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fhj.2026.100503
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Consumer Attitudes and Food Labeling
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
41.85
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Why is there no regulation despite evidence that ultra-processed foods are hazardous to long-term health?

Aga Khan, John O. Warner
1 citations
Future Healthcare Journal
Consumer Attitudes and Food Labeling
41.85
article

Why is there no regulation despite evidence that ultra-processed foods are hazardous to long-term health?

Aga Khan, John O. Warner
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Non-communicable diseases (NCDs) have exceeded infectious diseases as a global health threat. This shift has occurred concurrently with changes to lifestyle and diet, of which the increased consumption of ultra-processed foods (UPFs) is particularly concerning. UPFs are defined by industrial processing of often cheaply sourced natural food and inclusion of non-nutritional additives such as azo-dye colourants, non-caloric sweeteners, emulsifiers and preservatives. They now account for approximately half of the caloric intake in many countries and notably by children. These products can compromise nutritional quality while promoting hedonistic hunger and disrupting the gut microbiota. Population studies are increasingly demonstrating an association between high UPF consumption and increased all-cause mortality, obesity, cardiovascular disease, cancer risk, mental health and neuro-behavioural disorders. While association studies cannot account for all potential confounding factors, triangulation through combining large-scale cohort studies with animal/<i>in vitro</i> models and human challenge studies provides more compelling evidence that UPFs increase the risks of NCDs. Despite the increasing evidence, regulatory action on their use has remained limited. We review the evidence and explore the reasons why effective regulation is lacking, with increasing examples of inappropriate food industry influence on political decisions in several countries. The current focus on reducing consumption of high fat, sugar and salt has distracted attention from the adverse effects of alternative non-nutritional additives. We propose changes to food labelling and call for public health interventions to combat and minimise UPF consumption. These interventions are especially vital for socioeconomically disadvantaged populations and children, who increasingly consume UPFs as attractive and cheaper alternatives to fresh or minimally processed products. Urgent action is needed to promote healthier dietary practices worldwide.

Future Healthcare JournalVol. 13(1)
Lung Institute (US), University of Sheffield (GB)
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Consumer Attitudes and Food Labeling
41.85
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.