Process Evaluation of Teams: A Revised Framework for Use in Extension

Limited information exists on evaluating Extension team dynamics to determine activities that positively or negatively impact team outcomes. We sought to identify a new evaluation pathway for Extension teams and reviewed the health field's process evaluation frameworks for potential use in social sciences. We began by updating current process evaluation frameworks in the literature so they could be applied to social sciences and Extension contexts. We then developed a new framework and tested its relevance by implementing a process evaluation for a recent Extension project team. We analyzed the team's backwards plan and project notes and conducted semi-structured interviews with ten project participants. We found that the newly developed process evaluation provides valuable information on team dynamics and activities, but that the most efficient measurement source depends on the specific core component or moderating factor being evaluated.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
American Journal of Evaluation
Published
2026-01-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/10982140251411595
Primary Topic
Health Policy Implementation Science
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Process Evaluation of Teams: A Revised Framework for Use in Extension

Stacey Stearns, Jeantyl Norze, Cristina Connolly
American Journal of Evaluation
Health Policy Implementation Science
article

Process Evaluation of Teams: A Revised Framework for Use in Extension

Stacey Stearns, Jeantyl Norze, Cristina Connolly
article en

Abstract

Limited information exists on evaluating Extension team dynamics to determine activities that positively or negatively impact team outcomes. We sought to identify a new evaluation pathway for Extension teams and reviewed the health field's process evaluation frameworks for potential use in social sciences. We began by updating current process evaluation frameworks in the literature so they could be applied to social sciences and Extension contexts. We then developed a new framework and tested its relevance by implementing a process evaluation for a recent Extension project team. We analyzed the team's backwards plan and project notes and conducted semi-structured interviews with ten project participants. We found that the newly developed process evaluation provides valuable information on team dynamics and activities, but that the most efficient measurement source depends on the specific core component or moderating factor being evaluated.

American Journal of Evaluation
University of Connecticut (US), University of Arkansas at Fayetteville (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 83%
Health Policy Implementation Science
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Process Evaluation of Teams: A Revised Framework for Use in Extension — Stacey Stearns, Jeantyl Norze, et al. · American Journal of Evaluation (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS