CD56 negativity is associated with worse survival outcomes in patients with multiple myeloma: a meta-analysis

The prognostic value of cluster of differentiation 56 (CD56) in patients with multiple myeloma (MM) is controversial. This meta-analysis aimed to investigate the association of CD56 with overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) in patients with MM. Studies reporting the association of CD56 with survival outcomes in patients with MM were included. Hazard ratio (HR) values with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were gathered for pooled analysis. Twenty-two studies with 2791 patients were included. CD56 negativity was associated with worse OS [HR (95% CI): 2.04 (1.57, 2.65), p < 0.001] and PFS [HR (95% CI): 1.43 (1.23, 1.65), p < 0.001] in patients with MM. Subgroup analyses stratified by regions and CD56 cutoff values were performed. CD56 negativity was associated with shorter OS in studies conducted in Asian countries, studies using ≤ 20% for the cutoff value, and studies using other cutoff values (all p < 0.01). In studies conducted in regions other than Asia, CD56 was not associated with OS. Additionally, CD56 negativity was associated with worse PFS, regardless of region and CD56 cutoff value (all p < 0.05). No publication bias was found, and the pooled analysis was robust. CD56 negativity serves as a potential biomarker for predicting worse survival outcomes in patients with MM, especially in Asians, which could improve personalized treatment for these patients.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
World Journal of Surgical Oncology
Published
2026-01-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12957-026-04220-x
Primary Topic
Multiple Myeloma Research and Treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

CD56 negativity is associated with worse survival outcomes in patients with multiple myeloma: a meta-analysis

Guiyang Zhu, Shenchao Zhu, Qin Tang, Fei Yang
World Journal of Surgical Oncology
Multiple Myeloma Research and Treatments
article

CD56 negativity is associated with worse survival outcomes in patients with multiple myeloma: a meta-analysis

Guiyang Zhu, Shenchao Zhu, Qin Tang, Fei Yang
article en

Abstract

The prognostic value of cluster of differentiation 56 (CD56) in patients with multiple myeloma (MM) is controversial. This meta-analysis aimed to investigate the association of CD56 with overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) in patients with MM. Studies reporting the association of CD56 with survival outcomes in patients with MM were included. Hazard ratio (HR) values with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were gathered for pooled analysis. Twenty-two studies with 2791 patients were included. CD56 negativity was associated with worse OS [HR (95% CI): 2.04 (1.57, 2.65), p < 0.001] and PFS [HR (95% CI): 1.43 (1.23, 1.65), p < 0.001] in patients with MM. Subgroup analyses stratified by regions and CD56 cutoff values were performed. CD56 negativity was associated with shorter OS in studies conducted in Asian countries, studies using ≤ 20% for the cutoff value, and studies using other cutoff values (all p < 0.01). In studies conducted in regions other than Asia, CD56 was not associated with OS. Additionally, CD56 negativity was associated with worse PFS, regardless of region and CD56 cutoff value (all p < 0.05). No publication bias was found, and the pooled analysis was robust. CD56 negativity serves as a potential biomarker for predicting worse survival outcomes in patients with MM, especially in Asians, which could improve personalized treatment for these patients.

World Journal of Surgical OncologyVol. 24(1)
Jiangsu University (CN), Chengdu Military General Hospital (CN), Jintan People's Hospital (CN), Institute of New Materials (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 82%
Multiple Myeloma Research and Treatments
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.