Feeding the Family—A Food Is Medicine Intervention: Preliminary Baseline Results of Clinical Data from Caregivers and Children

<b>Background/Objectives</b>: Food is Medicine (FIM) programs have been shown to be effective at addressing food and nutrition insecurity among individuals. However, more evidence is needed to determine effective interventions at the household level and their impact on child health outcomes. <i>Feeding the Family</i> is a randomized controlled trial which aims to determine whether the amount of food provided and the ability to select foods in FIM interventions have an incremental effect on child and caregiver clinical outcomes relative to nutrition counseling alone. The objective of this paper is to describe the population at baseline among those enrolled in <i>Feeding the Family</i>, an FIM family intervention. <b>Methods</b>: A pragmatic randomized controlled trial (pRCT) with a 2 × 2 factorial study design was used at an urban primary care clinic. Participants were randomized into one of four arms for a 3-month intervention: (1) medically tailored meals (MTMs), (2) grocery prescription (GP), (3) combined MTMs + GP, and (4) delayed control. Primary outcomes consisted of child and caregiver biomarkers (BMI, blood pressure, A1c, LDL, and HDL). Secondary outcomes included child and caregiver dietary behaviors, nutrition security, and food security. Spearman correlations and Kruskal-Wallis rank sum tests determined correlations between caregiver and child biomarkers, as well as correlations between caregiver socioeconomic factors and child outcomes, respectively. <b>Results</b>: Thirty-one caregivers and fifty-one children were enrolled. Nearly 90% of caregivers reported low-very low household food security; 93.6% experienced ongoing financial strain. Several caregiver-child biomarker correlations were observed, including caregiver and child BMI (r = 0.59, <i>p</i> = 0.043), caregiver LDL and child A1c (r = -0.79, <i>p</i> = 0.004), and caregiver total cholesterol and child BMI (r = -0.62, <i>p</i> = 0.032). In addition, food assistance status was associated with child vegetable intake (H = 6.16, <i>df</i> = 2, <i>p</i> = 0.046), and caregiver food security score was associated with child food security score (H = 18.31, <i>df</i> = 9, <i>p</i> = 0.032). <b>Conclusions</b>: There are robust correlations between caregiver and child clinical outcomes at baseline. These findings underscore the need for FIM research to examine how a tailored program can improve the clinical outcomes of entire households to address health disparities effectively.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Nutrients
Published
2026-01-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/nu18020354
Primary Topic
Food Security and Health in Diverse Populations
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Feeding the Family—A Food Is Medicine Intervention: Preliminary Baseline Results of Clinical Data from Caregivers and Children

Tabitha Underwood, Gabriela Drucker, Sara J. Maksi, Julie A. Brown et al.
Nutrients
Food Security and Health in Diverse Populations
article

Feeding the Family—A Food Is Medicine Intervention: Preliminary Baseline Results of Clinical Data from Caregivers and Children

Tabitha Underwood, Gabriela Drucker, Sara J. Maksi, Julie A. Brown, Elizabeth Anderson Steeves, Christa Mayfield, Marissa Frick
article en

Abstract

<b>Background/Objectives</b>: Food is Medicine (FIM) programs have been shown to be effective at addressing food and nutrition insecurity among individuals. However, more evidence is needed to determine effective interventions at the household level and their impact on child health outcomes. <i>Feeding the Family</i> is a randomized controlled trial which aims to determine whether the amount of food provided and the ability to select foods in FIM interventions have an incremental effect on child and caregiver clinical outcomes relative to nutrition counseling alone. The objective of this paper is to describe the population at baseline among those enrolled in <i>Feeding the Family</i>, an FIM family intervention. <b>Methods</b>: A pragmatic randomized controlled trial (pRCT) with a 2 × 2 factorial study design was used at an urban primary care clinic. Participants were randomized into one of four arms for a 3-month intervention: (1) medically tailored meals (MTMs), (2) grocery prescription (GP), (3) combined MTMs + GP, and (4) delayed control. Primary outcomes consisted of child and caregiver biomarkers (BMI, blood pressure, A1c, LDL, and HDL). Secondary outcomes included child and caregiver dietary behaviors, nutrition security, and food security. Spearman correlations and Kruskal-Wallis rank sum tests determined correlations between caregiver and child biomarkers, as well as correlations between caregiver socioeconomic factors and child outcomes, respectively. <b>Results</b>: Thirty-one caregivers and fifty-one children were enrolled. Nearly 90% of caregivers reported low-very low household food security; 93.6% experienced ongoing financial strain. Several caregiver-child biomarker correlations were observed, including caregiver and child BMI (r = 0.59, <i>p</i> = 0.043), caregiver LDL and child A1c (r = -0.79, <i>p</i> = 0.004), and caregiver total cholesterol and child BMI (r = -0.62, <i>p</i> = 0.032). In addition, food assistance status was associated with child vegetable intake (H = 6.16, <i>df</i> = 2, <i>p</i> = 0.046), and caregiver food security score was associated with child food security score (H = 18.31, <i>df</i> = 9, <i>p</i> = 0.032). <b>Conclusions</b>: There are robust correlations between caregiver and child clinical outcomes at baseline. These findings underscore the need for FIM research to examine how a tailored program can improve the clinical outcomes of entire households to address health disparities effectively.

NutrientsVol. 18(2)
University of Kentucky (US), CHI Health (US), University of Louisville Physicians (US)
National Institute on Minority Health and Health Disparities
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 83%
Food Security and Health in Diverse Populations
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.