EU-TURKEY STATEMENT: AN AMBIGUOUS RELATIONSHIP

The EU-Turkey Statement was released on March 18, via the Council of the European Union’s webpage. Immediate and intensive negotiations began in October 2015, leading to the Statement delivered on the grounds of the European Council meeting on 17-18 March 2016. This problematic and controversial statement has been consistently proclaimed by the European Council. This paper focuses on the legal flaws and implementation challenges of the EU-Turkey deal. Regarding the procedure, EU norms for negotiating with third parties are laid forth in Article 218 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union. It refers to collaboration between the EU and a non-EU country. I analyse the General Court orders which are the first rulings on the EU-Turkey Statement and evaluate these decisions in light of EU legal regulations and literature in law. The article further situates the EU-Turkey Statement within recent developments in EU migration governance, demonstrating its continued relevance in light of post-2020 externalisation practices and recent CJEU case-law. By situating the EU-Turkey Statement within post-2020 EU migration governance and recent CJEU case-law, the article demonstrates how the Statement has evolved from a contested crisis measure into a structural template for contemporary EU externalisation practices.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Aristotle University of Thessaloniki
Published
2026-01-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.26262/hrecl.v0i0.11127
Primary Topic
European Union Policy and Governance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

EU-TURKEY STATEMENT: AN AMBIGUOUS RELATIONSHIP

Havva Yesil
Aristotle University of Thessaloniki
European Union Policy and Governance
article

EU-TURKEY STATEMENT: AN AMBIGUOUS RELATIONSHIP

Havva Yesil
article en

Abstract

The EU-Turkey Statement was released on March 18, via the Council of the European Union’s webpage. Immediate and intensive negotiations began in October 2015, leading to the Statement delivered on the grounds of the European Council meeting on 17-18 March 2016. This problematic and controversial statement has been consistently proclaimed by the European Council. This paper focuses on the legal flaws and implementation challenges of the EU-Turkey deal. Regarding the procedure, EU norms for negotiating with third parties are laid forth in Article 218 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union. It refers to collaboration between the EU and a non-EU country. I analyse the General Court orders which are the first rulings on the EU-Turkey Statement and evaluate these decisions in light of EU legal regulations and literature in law. The article further situates the EU-Turkey Statement within recent developments in EU migration governance, demonstrating its continued relevance in light of post-2020 externalisation practices and recent CJEU case-law. By situating the EU-Turkey Statement within post-2020 EU migration governance and recent CJEU case-law, the article demonstrates how the Statement has evolved from a contested crisis measure into a structural template for contemporary EU externalisation practices.

Aristotle University of Thessaloniki
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 83%
European Union Policy and Governance
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.