More Than We Can Return: Rethinking Reciprocity with a Nature That Heals Us

Nature-based interventions (NBI) and Green Prescriptions (GRx) have renewed interest in the relationship between human well-being and ecosystems, yet their implementation often risks reproducing the utilitarian logic underlying environmental degradation. Reciprocity between humans and Nature is increasingly invoked as a promising principle for restoring individual and Planetary Health. However, while appealing, this framework risks falling into a transactional model rooted in symmetry and apparent equivalence, obscuring the complexity and nonlinear dynamics of ecosystem functioning. This work explores reciprocity within Nature-based health interventions and ecosystem services, revealing paradoxes and limitations and arguing for a shift from transactional reciprocity toward interconnectedness and relational interbeing. Such awareness is crucial when humans interact with ecosystems to benefit from their restorativeness and therapeutic potential. We discuss how high-biodiversity and ecologically vulnerable environments derive therapeutic potential from their rarity and sensitivity, making unrestricted access for tourism, recreation, or health practices ecologically untenable. We propose that NBI and GRx must integrate, alongside clinical protocols, considerations of ecosystem health, carrying capacity, nonhuman life needs, and cumulative pressures arising when therapeutic use overlaps with other human presence. Biocultural perspectives further emphasize relational embeddedness and kinship obligations, aligning with One Health and Planetary Health principles that view human well-being as inseparable from ecosystem vitality. We propose that genuine care for Nature may not require “doing more” or “faster,” but doing less and more slowly: exercising self-restraint, reducing pressure on ecosystems, renouncing control, and tempering the human ego to prioritize Nature’s evolved processes over active interventions. Ethical and operational implications include reframing conservation and ecological management around self-limitation, intergenerational justice, and recognition of nonhuman agency, fostering coexistence over compensation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Ecopsychology
Published
2026-01-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/19429347261415609
Primary Topic
Urban Green Space and Health
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

More Than We Can Return: Rethinking Reciprocity with a Nature That Heals Us

Alice Stocco, Giuseppe Barbiero, Fabio Pranovi, Stefania Pinna
Ecopsychology
Urban Green Space and Health
article

More Than We Can Return: Rethinking Reciprocity with a Nature That Heals Us

Alice Stocco, Giuseppe Barbiero, Fabio Pranovi, Stefania Pinna
article en

Abstract

Nature-based interventions (NBI) and Green Prescriptions (GRx) have renewed interest in the relationship between human well-being and ecosystems, yet their implementation often risks reproducing the utilitarian logic underlying environmental degradation. Reciprocity between humans and Nature is increasingly invoked as a promising principle for restoring individual and Planetary Health. However, while appealing, this framework risks falling into a transactional model rooted in symmetry and apparent equivalence, obscuring the complexity and nonlinear dynamics of ecosystem functioning. This work explores reciprocity within Nature-based health interventions and ecosystem services, revealing paradoxes and limitations and arguing for a shift from transactional reciprocity toward interconnectedness and relational interbeing. Such awareness is crucial when humans interact with ecosystems to benefit from their restorativeness and therapeutic potential. We discuss how high-biodiversity and ecologically vulnerable environments derive therapeutic potential from their rarity and sensitivity, making unrestricted access for tourism, recreation, or health practices ecologically untenable. We propose that NBI and GRx must integrate, alongside clinical protocols, considerations of ecosystem health, carrying capacity, nonhuman life needs, and cumulative pressures arising when therapeutic use overlaps with other human presence. Biocultural perspectives further emphasize relational embeddedness and kinship obligations, aligning with One Health and Planetary Health principles that view human well-being as inseparable from ecosystem vitality. We propose that genuine care for Nature may not require “doing more” or “faster,” but doing less and more slowly: exercising self-restraint, reducing pressure on ecosystems, renouncing control, and tempering the human ego to prioritize Nature’s evolved processes over active interventions. Ethical and operational implications include reframing conservation and ecological management around self-limitation, intergenerational justice, and recognition of nonhuman agency, fostering coexistence over compensation.

Ecopsychology
Ca' Foscari University of Venice (IT), University of Aosta Valley (IT)
Decent work and economic growth
Openalex Percentile: Top 81%
Urban Green Space and Health
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.