Promoter Methylation–Expression Coupling of Gliogenesis Genes in IDH-Wildtype Glioblastoma: Longitudinal Analysis and Prognostic Value

Glioblastoma (GBM) shows extensive epigenetic heterogeneity. In <i>IDH</i>-wildtype (<i>IDH</i>-WT) GBM, promoter DNA methylation may regulate lineage programs influencing tumor evolution and prognosis; here, we systematically profiled promoter-level methylation dynamics across longitudinal tumors. Genome-wide DNA methylation data were obtained from the publicly available Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO; GSE279073) dataset, comprising a longitudinal cohort of 226 <i>IDH</i>-wildtype glioblastomas profiled on the Illumina Infinium EPIC 850K array across primary and recurrent stages at the University of California, San Francisco. From 333 Gene Ontology gliogenesis-annotated genes (GO:0042063), a 48-gene promoter panel was derived, with ≥2 probes per gene. Promoter methylation was summarized as the median β-value and tested using one-sample Wilcoxon with FDR correction. Functional enrichment, longitudinal variation, and patient-level methylation burden were assessed. Validation analyses were performed using independent <i>IDH</i>-wildtype GBM datasets from The Cancer Genome Atlas (RNA-seq and 450K methylation; <i>n</i> = 347). Promoter hypomethylation predominated across all stages, with 25 genes consistently hypomethylated and 7 hypermethylated. Functional enrichment highlighted gliogenesis, glial cell differentiation, neurogenesis, and Notch-related signaling. In TCGA, promoter methylation inversely correlated with expression for 11 of 33 genes (FDR < 0.05). An Expression Score contrasting hypomethylated and hypermethylated genes was positively associated with improved overall survival, where higher scores predicted better outcome (HR = 0.87, <i>p</i> = 0.016; Q4 vs. Q1 HR = 0.68, <i>p</i> = 0.025), and a complementary Methylation Score showed that higher promoter hypermethylation predicted poorer outcome (HR = 1.73, <i>p</i> < 0.001). <i>CNTN2</i> and <i>TSPAN2</i> were adverse prognostic genes (FDR < 0.05). The Expression Score was highest in Proneural tumors and lowest in Mesenchymal tumors (<i>p</i> < 0.001), reflecting a proneural-like state associated with better prognosis. Promoter methylation within gliogenesis genes defines a stable yet prognostically informative epigenetic signature in <i>IDH</i>-WT GBM. Hypomethylation promotes transcriptional activation and a favorable outcome, whereas hypermethylation represses lineage programs and predicts poorer survival.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
Published
2026-01-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms27021112
Primary Topic
Glioma Diagnosis and Treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Promoter Methylation–Expression Coupling of Gliogenesis Genes in IDH-Wildtype Glioblastoma: Longitudinal Analysis and Prognostic Value

Ligia Gabriela Tătăranu, Roxana Radu, Anica Dricu, Oana Alexandru
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
Glioma Diagnosis and Treatment
article

Promoter Methylation–Expression Coupling of Gliogenesis Genes in IDH-Wildtype Glioblastoma: Longitudinal Analysis and Prognostic Value

Ligia Gabriela Tătăranu, Roxana Radu, Anica Dricu, Oana Alexandru
article en

Abstract

Glioblastoma (GBM) shows extensive epigenetic heterogeneity. In <i>IDH</i>-wildtype (<i>IDH</i>-WT) GBM, promoter DNA methylation may regulate lineage programs influencing tumor evolution and prognosis; here, we systematically profiled promoter-level methylation dynamics across longitudinal tumors. Genome-wide DNA methylation data were obtained from the publicly available Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO; GSE279073) dataset, comprising a longitudinal cohort of 226 <i>IDH</i>-wildtype glioblastomas profiled on the Illumina Infinium EPIC 850K array across primary and recurrent stages at the University of California, San Francisco. From 333 Gene Ontology gliogenesis-annotated genes (GO:0042063), a 48-gene promoter panel was derived, with ≥2 probes per gene. Promoter methylation was summarized as the median β-value and tested using one-sample Wilcoxon with FDR correction. Functional enrichment, longitudinal variation, and patient-level methylation burden were assessed. Validation analyses were performed using independent <i>IDH</i>-wildtype GBM datasets from The Cancer Genome Atlas (RNA-seq and 450K methylation; <i>n</i> = 347). Promoter hypomethylation predominated across all stages, with 25 genes consistently hypomethylated and 7 hypermethylated. Functional enrichment highlighted gliogenesis, glial cell differentiation, neurogenesis, and Notch-related signaling. In TCGA, promoter methylation inversely correlated with expression for 11 of 33 genes (FDR < 0.05). An Expression Score contrasting hypomethylated and hypermethylated genes was positively associated with improved overall survival, where higher scores predicted better outcome (HR = 0.87, <i>p</i> = 0.016; Q4 vs. Q1 HR = 0.68, <i>p</i> = 0.025), and a complementary Methylation Score showed that higher promoter hypermethylation predicted poorer outcome (HR = 1.73, <i>p</i> < 0.001). <i>CNTN2</i> and <i>TSPAN2</i> were adverse prognostic genes (FDR < 0.05). The Expression Score was highest in Proneural tumors and lowest in Mesenchymal tumors (<i>p</i> < 0.001), reflecting a proneural-like state associated with better prognosis. Promoter methylation within gliogenesis genes defines a stable yet prognostically informative epigenetic signature in <i>IDH</i>-WT GBM. Hypomethylation promotes transcriptional activation and a favorable outcome, whereas hypermethylation represses lineage programs and predicts poorer survival.

International Journal of Molecular SciencesVol. 27(2)
Carol Davila University of Medicine and Pharmacy (RO), Clinical Emergency Hospital Bucharest (RO), University of Medicine and Pharmacy of Craiova (RO)
Unitatea Executiva pentru Finantarea Invatamantului Superior, a Cercetarii, Dezvoltarii si Inovarii
No poverty
Openalex Percentile: Top 80%
Glioma Diagnosis and Treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.