Ideal observer estimation for binary tasks with stochastic object models

<i>Objective.</i>We propose a new formulation for ideal observers (IOs) that incorporate stochastic object models (SOMs) for data acquisition optimization.<i>Approach</i>. A data acquisition system is considered as a (possibly nonlinear) discrete-to-discrete mapping from a finite-dimensional object space,x∈Rnd, to a finite-dimensional measurement space,y∈Rm. For binary tasks, the two underlying SOMs,H0and<i>H</i><sub>1</sub>, are specified by two probability density functions (PDFs)p0(x),p1(x). This leads to the notion of intrinsic likelihood ratio (LR)ΛI(x)=p1(x)/p0(x)and intrinsic class separability (ICS), the latter quantifies the population separability that is independent of data acquisition. With respect to ICS, the IO employs the 'extrinsic' LRΛ(y)=pr(y|H1)/pr(y|H0)of the data and quantifies the extrinsic class separability (ECS). The difference between ICS and ECS measures the efficiency of data acquisition. We show that the extrinsic LRΛ(y)is the expectation of the intrinsic LRΛI(x), where the expectation is with respect to the posterior PDFpr(x|y,H0)underH0.<i>Main results</i>. We use two examples, one to clarify the new IO and the second to demonstrate its potential for real world applications. Specifically, we apply the new IO to spectral optimization in dual-energy CT projection domain material decomposition (pMD), for which SOMs are used to describe variability of basis material line integrals. The performance rank orders obtained by IO agree with physics predictions.<i>Significance.</i>The main computation in the new IO involves sampling from the posterior PDFpr(x|y,H0), which are similar to (fully) Bayesian reconstruction. Thus our IO computation is amenable to standard techniques already familiar to CT researchers. The example of dual-energy pMD serves as a prototype for other spectral optimization problems, e.g., for photon counting CT or multi-energy CT with multi-layer detectors.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Physics in Medicine and Biology
Published
2026-01-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6560/ae3c53
Primary Topic
Gaussian Processes and Bayesian Inference
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Ideal observer estimation for binary tasks with stochastic object models

F. Noo, Jingyan Xu
Physics in Medicine and Biology
Gaussian Processes and Bayesian Inference
article

Ideal observer estimation for binary tasks with stochastic object models

F. Noo, Jingyan Xu
article en

Abstract

<i>Objective.</i>We propose a new formulation for ideal observers (IOs) that incorporate stochastic object models (SOMs) for data acquisition optimization.<i>Approach</i>. A data acquisition system is considered as a (possibly nonlinear) discrete-to-discrete mapping from a finite-dimensional object space,x∈Rnd, to a finite-dimensional measurement space,y∈Rm. For binary tasks, the two underlying SOMs,H0and<i>H</i><sub>1</sub>, are specified by two probability density functions (PDFs)p0(x),p1(x). This leads to the notion of intrinsic likelihood ratio (LR)ΛI(x)=p1(x)/p0(x)and intrinsic class separability (ICS), the latter quantifies the population separability that is independent of data acquisition. With respect to ICS, the IO employs the 'extrinsic' LRΛ(y)=pr(y|H1)/pr(y|H0)of the data and quantifies the extrinsic class separability (ECS). The difference between ICS and ECS measures the efficiency of data acquisition. We show that the extrinsic LRΛ(y)is the expectation of the intrinsic LRΛI(x), where the expectation is with respect to the posterior PDFpr(x|y,H0)underH0.<i>Main results</i>. We use two examples, one to clarify the new IO and the second to demonstrate its potential for real world applications. Specifically, we apply the new IO to spectral optimization in dual-energy CT projection domain material decomposition (pMD), for which SOMs are used to describe variability of basis material line integrals. The performance rank orders obtained by IO agree with physics predictions.<i>Significance.</i>The main computation in the new IO involves sampling from the posterior PDFpr(x|y,H0), which are similar to (fully) Bayesian reconstruction. Thus our IO computation is amenable to standard techniques already familiar to CT researchers. The example of dual-energy pMD serves as a prototype for other spectral optimization problems, e.g., for photon counting CT or multi-energy CT with multi-layer detectors.

Physics in Medicine and BiologyVol. 71(4)
Johns Hopkins University (US), University of Utah (US)
National Institutes of Health
Openalex Percentile: Top 81%
Gaussian Processes and Bayesian Inference
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.