Acceptance and Use of Generative Artificial Intelligence in Higher Education: A UTAUT-Based Model Integrating Trust and Privacy

The rapid emergence of generative artificial intelligence (GAI) is reshaping academic work in higher education. While classical technology acceptance models primarily emphasize cognitive and instrumental determinants, the adoption of GAI also raises ethical concerns related to trust in AI systems and the protection of personal and institutional data. To address this gap, this study examines the determinants of GAI acceptance and use among academic staff in Slovenian higher education institutions by applying a UTAUT-based model that integrates trust and privacy. In this study, GAI is conceptualized as a class of text-based generative AI tools commonly used in academic practice, including applications such as ChatGPT, Copilot, Scholar AI, Gemini, Consensus, and similar systems. A quantitative research design was employed, based on a structured online survey administered to academic staff across 20 higher education institutions in Slovenia (n = 201). Data were analyzed using multilevel confirmatory factor analysis and generalized estimating equations. The results indicate that performance expectancy and attitude toward using significantly predict behavioral intention to use GAI (B = 0.49, p < 0.001 for both), while behavioral intention is the primary predictor of actual use behavior (B = 0.93, p < 0.001). Effort expectancy is positively associated with use behavior independent of behavioral intention (B = 0.23, p = 0.012), whereas trust does not show a statistically significant association with use behavior (B = 0.05, p = 0.458) or behavioral intention (B = −0.01, p = 0.840). Privacy exhibits a positive, but non-statistically significant, association with use behavior (B = 0.12, p = 0.058). The findings highlight the relevance of considering both cognitive and ethical factors when examining generative AI adoption in academic contexts and provide initial empirical insights for refining UTAUT-based frameworks in the context of emerging AI technologies.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Education Sciences
Published
2026-01-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci16020173
Primary Topic
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Acceptance and Use of Generative Artificial Intelligence in Higher Education: A UTAUT-Based Model Integrating Trust and Privacy

Lidija Weis, Vanja Erčulj, Julija Lapuh Bele
Education Sciences
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
article

Acceptance and Use of Generative Artificial Intelligence in Higher Education: A UTAUT-Based Model Integrating Trust and Privacy

Lidija Weis, Vanja Erčulj, Julija Lapuh Bele
article en

Abstract

The rapid emergence of generative artificial intelligence (GAI) is reshaping academic work in higher education. While classical technology acceptance models primarily emphasize cognitive and instrumental determinants, the adoption of GAI also raises ethical concerns related to trust in AI systems and the protection of personal and institutional data. To address this gap, this study examines the determinants of GAI acceptance and use among academic staff in Slovenian higher education institutions by applying a UTAUT-based model that integrates trust and privacy. In this study, GAI is conceptualized as a class of text-based generative AI tools commonly used in academic practice, including applications such as ChatGPT, Copilot, Scholar AI, Gemini, Consensus, and similar systems. A quantitative research design was employed, based on a structured online survey administered to academic staff across 20 higher education institutions in Slovenia (n = 201). Data were analyzed using multilevel confirmatory factor analysis and generalized estimating equations. The results indicate that performance expectancy and attitude toward using significantly predict behavioral intention to use GAI (B = 0.49, p < 0.001 for both), while behavioral intention is the primary predictor of actual use behavior (B = 0.93, p < 0.001). Effort expectancy is positively associated with use behavior independent of behavioral intention (B = 0.23, p = 0.012), whereas trust does not show a statistically significant association with use behavior (B = 0.05, p = 0.458) or behavioral intention (B = −0.01, p = 0.840). Privacy exhibits a positive, but non-statistically significant, association with use behavior (B = 0.12, p = 0.058). The findings highlight the relevance of considering both cognitive and ethical factors when examining generative AI adoption in academic contexts and provide initial empirical insights for refining UTAUT-based frameworks in the context of emerging AI technologies.

Education SciencesVol. 16(2)
University of Maribor (SI), Biotechnical Educational Centre Ljubljana (SI), B2 (Slovenia) (SI)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 82%
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.