Application of the Emergency Response Framework by a WHO country office during an acute-onset emergency

In November 2023, a 6.4-magnitude earthquake struck western Nepal, its most powerful since 2015, causing severe destruction in the Jajarkot, Rukum, and Salyan districts. The disaster left 154 dead, thousands homeless, and over 75 health facilities non-functional. In response to government's request for support, World Health Organization (WHO) Nepal applied the Emergency Response Framework (ERF) 2.0 to structure its operations, demonstrating how a WHO country office could operationalize ERF protocols during an acute-onset emergency. Through the activation of a whole-of-office incident management team (IMT), including an active field-level presence, WHO Nepal met key ERF performance standards such as staff safety, rapid situation analysis, and coordinated action. This experience addresses the limited documentation on the practical application of the ERF at the country level and offers insights into the preconditions necessary for its effective use in real-world emergencies. Following the Jajarkot response, the WHO country office institutionalized ERF-recommended practices across operational units, creating a model that was successfully replicated during the 2024 floods and landslides affecting three provinces. This experience underlines the idea that, while the ERF provides a strong structural foundation for emergency response, its effective implementation hinges on institutional readiness, specifically a capacitated and trained workforce, functional coordination mechanisms, and established operational infrastructures. WHO Nepal's response demonstrates how structured frameworks like the ERF can enhance preparedness and enable scalable, flexible responses in disaster-prone settings, offering a replicable approach for other WHO country offices and partners working in similar contexts.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Frontiers in Disaster and Emergency Medicine
Published
2026-01-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/femer.2025.1697272
Primary Topic
Disaster Response and Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Application of the Emergency Response Framework by a WHO country office during an acute-onset emergency

Allison Gocotano, Rajesh Sambhajirao Pandav, Saugat Shrestha, Prahlad Dahal et al.
Frontiers in Disaster and Emergency Medicine
Disaster Response and Management
article

Application of the Emergency Response Framework by a WHO country office during an acute-onset emergency

Allison Gocotano, Rajesh Sambhajirao Pandav, Saugat Shrestha, Prahlad Dahal, Subash Neupane, Dipendra Gautam, Saugat Pratap K. C., Deepesh Sthapit
article en

Abstract

In November 2023, a 6.4-magnitude earthquake struck western Nepal, its most powerful since 2015, causing severe destruction in the Jajarkot, Rukum, and Salyan districts. The disaster left 154 dead, thousands homeless, and over 75 health facilities non-functional. In response to government's request for support, World Health Organization (WHO) Nepal applied the Emergency Response Framework (ERF) 2.0 to structure its operations, demonstrating how a WHO country office could operationalize ERF protocols during an acute-onset emergency. Through the activation of a whole-of-office incident management team (IMT), including an active field-level presence, WHO Nepal met key ERF performance standards such as staff safety, rapid situation analysis, and coordinated action. This experience addresses the limited documentation on the practical application of the ERF at the country level and offers insights into the preconditions necessary for its effective use in real-world emergencies. Following the Jajarkot response, the WHO country office institutionalized ERF-recommended practices across operational units, creating a model that was successfully replicated during the 2024 floods and landslides affecting three provinces. This experience underlines the idea that, while the ERF provides a strong structural foundation for emergency response, its effective implementation hinges on institutional readiness, specifically a capacitated and trained workforce, functional coordination mechanisms, and established operational infrastructures. WHO Nepal's response demonstrates how structured frameworks like the ERF can enhance preparedness and enable scalable, flexible responses in disaster-prone settings, offering a replicable approach for other WHO country offices and partners working in similar contexts.

Frontiers in Disaster and Emergency MedicineVol. 3
World Health Organization - Pakistan (PK)
Openalex Percentile: Top 83%
Disaster Response and Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.