Geopolitical risks and energy commodities dynamics in G7 economies towards business sustainability

Purpose This paper aims to study the relationships between a set of energy commodities (carbon emissions, Brent, heating oil and natural gas) and the geopolitical risk (GPR) indices of each of the G7 countries (USA, Japan, Germany, United Kingdom, France, Italy and Canada), before and after the beginning of the recent armed conflicts in Russia and Israel. Design/methodology/approach The authors applied a time-varying parameter-vector autoregression methodology, using the monthly GPR index data and the monthly commodities returns, which covers the period between July 2019 and August 2024. This time frame includes the events of the Russian–Ukrainian War and the Israel–Palestinian War, allowing this study to have two periods: one before the wars started and another after their beginning. Findings The authors concluded that natural gas is a transmitter of shocks in both periods to GPR_JP and GPR_CAN after the wars began. The other commodities in the prewar period were essentially net receivers of shocks. After the wars started, they underwent a complete transformation in their behavior related to the GPR indexes and became transmitters of shocks. Originality/value This significant shift in behavior is a key finding of the research, providing a new perspective on the dynamics between GPR and energy commodities. Practical and social implications are discussed from the perspective of business sustainability, thereby offering a novel contribution to the literature, while also analyzing recent crisis episodes using an appropriate technique.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Innovation Science
Published
2026-01-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1108/ijis-06-2025-0310
Primary Topic
Market Dynamics and Volatility
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Geopolitical risks and energy commodities dynamics in G7 economies towards business sustainability

Manuel Carlos Nogueira, Viriato Soromenho-Marques, Mara Madaleno
International Journal of Innovation Science
Market Dynamics and Volatility
article

Geopolitical risks and energy commodities dynamics in G7 economies towards business sustainability

Manuel Carlos Nogueira, Viriato Soromenho-Marques, Mara Madaleno
article en

Abstract

Purpose This paper aims to study the relationships between a set of energy commodities (carbon emissions, Brent, heating oil and natural gas) and the geopolitical risk (GPR) indices of each of the G7 countries (USA, Japan, Germany, United Kingdom, France, Italy and Canada), before and after the beginning of the recent armed conflicts in Russia and Israel. Design/methodology/approach The authors applied a time-varying parameter-vector autoregression methodology, using the monthly GPR index data and the monthly commodities returns, which covers the period between July 2019 and August 2024. This time frame includes the events of the Russian–Ukrainian War and the Israel–Palestinian War, allowing this study to have two periods: one before the wars started and another after their beginning. Findings The authors concluded that natural gas is a transmitter of shocks in both periods to GPR_JP and GPR_CAN after the wars began. The other commodities in the prewar period were essentially net receivers of shocks. After the wars started, they underwent a complete transformation in their behavior related to the GPR indexes and became transmitters of shocks. Originality/value This significant shift in behavior is a key finding of the research, providing a new perspective on the dynamics between GPR and energy commodities. Practical and social implications are discussed from the perspective of business sustainability, thereby offering a novel contribution to the literature, while also analyzing recent crisis episodes using an appropriate technique.

International Journal of Innovation Science
University of Aveiro (PT)
Responsible consumption and production
Openalex Percentile: Top 84%
Market Dynamics and Volatility
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.