Bone-Morphology (BM) classification: a novel staging system for mandibular conventional ameloblastoma, a multicenter retrospective study

Ameloblastoma is the most common odontogenic epithelial tumor, characterized by local aggressiveness and high recurrence rates. Current management lacks a practical staging system to guide surgical decisions, making it challenging to balance radical resection with functional preservation. This retrospective cohort study developed and validated a novel bone destruction and radological Morphology (BM) staging system for mandibular conventional ameloblastoma. We analyzed 649 patients from three tertiary centers (2005–2024), categorizing them into BM stages I-III. Recurrence-free survival (RFS) was analyzed using Kaplan–Meier methods and log-rank tests. The BM staging system effectively stratified recurrence risk and guided surgical choices. The 5-year RFS rates decreased significantly with advancing stage: stage I (71.9%), stage II (46.4%), and stage III (24.5%) (P < 0.0001). In stage I, both curative resection surgery (CRS) and curettage and fenestration decompression (CFD) achieved 100% 5-year RFS. For stage II patients, CRS was marginally superior to CFD. For stage III, CRS led to significantly better outcomes (88.2%) than other approaches (P < 0.0001). In stages I and II, patients treated with fenestration decompression or local curettage had significantly worse prognosis than those receiving CRS or CFD. The BM staging system provides effective prognostic stratification and guides surgical decisions. Modified conservative surgery (CFD) is appropriate for stage I, while curative resection is recommended for stage III to minimize recurrence risk. For stage II patients, the choice between CRS and CFD should weigh the benefit of lower recurrence against the risk of jaw discontinuity and functional impairment.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BMC Oral Health
Published
2026-01-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-026-07654-7
Primary Topic
Oral and Maxillofacial Pathology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Bone-Morphology (BM) classification: a novel staging system for mandibular conventional ameloblastoma, a multicenter retrospective study

Shengqi Ouyang, J Q Liu, Wenjin Wang, Li Zhang et al.
BMC Oral Health
Oral and Maxillofacial Pathology
article

Bone-Morphology (BM) classification: a novel staging system for mandibular conventional ameloblastoma, a multicenter retrospective study

Shengqi Ouyang, J Q Liu, Wenjin Wang, Li Zhang, Linlin Ren, Zehang Zhuang, Z. Zhao, Gan Xiong, Zhien Feng, Yaqi Huang, Cheng Wang, Wei Cao
article en

Abstract

Ameloblastoma is the most common odontogenic epithelial tumor, characterized by local aggressiveness and high recurrence rates. Current management lacks a practical staging system to guide surgical decisions, making it challenging to balance radical resection with functional preservation. This retrospective cohort study developed and validated a novel bone destruction and radological Morphology (BM) staging system for mandibular conventional ameloblastoma. We analyzed 649 patients from three tertiary centers (2005–2024), categorizing them into BM stages I-III. Recurrence-free survival (RFS) was analyzed using Kaplan–Meier methods and log-rank tests. The BM staging system effectively stratified recurrence risk and guided surgical choices. The 5-year RFS rates decreased significantly with advancing stage: stage I (71.9%), stage II (46.4%), and stage III (24.5%) (P < 0.0001). In stage I, both curative resection surgery (CRS) and curettage and fenestration decompression (CFD) achieved 100% 5-year RFS. For stage II patients, CRS was marginally superior to CFD. For stage III, CRS led to significantly better outcomes (88.2%) than other approaches (P < 0.0001). In stages I and II, patients treated with fenestration decompression or local curettage had significantly worse prognosis than those receiving CRS or CFD. The BM staging system provides effective prognostic stratification and guides surgical decisions. Modified conservative surgery (CFD) is appropriate for stage I, while curative resection is recommended for stage III to minimize recurrence risk. For stage II patients, the choice between CRS and CFD should weigh the benefit of lower recurrence against the risk of jaw discontinuity and functional impairment.

BMC Oral HealthVol. 26(1)
Sun Yat-sen University (CN), Shanghai Jiao Tong University (CN), Capital Medical University (CN), Guangdong Province Stomatological Hospital (CN), Shanghai Stomatological Hospital (CN), Shanghai Ninth People's Hospital (CN), Beijing Anzhen Hospital (CN), Stomatology Hospital (CN), Hospital of Stomatology, Sun Yat-sen University
Openalex Percentile: Top 81%
Oral and Maxillofacial Pathology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.