Machine Learning Approaches to Forecast the Realized Volatility of Crude Oil Prices

ABSTRACT This paper presents an evaluation of the accuracy of machine learning (ML) techniques in forecasting the realized volatility of West Texas Intermediate (WTI) crude oil prices. We compare several ML algorithms, including regularization, regression trees, random forests, and neural networks, to several heterogeneous autoregressive (HAR) models. The results show that the ML and regularization methods are efficient, even when there are only three predictors: daily, weekly, and monthly realized volatility (RV) lags. In addition, when the ML and regularization methods are applied, the results become more pronounced over longer forecasting horizons, as well as for weekly and monthly horizons. These ML methods are effective in approximating long‐term realized volatility. Furthermore, we found that additional explanatory variables for real‐time currency exchange contain valuable information to forecast the RV of crude oil prices.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Forecasting
Published
2026-01-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/for.70107
Primary Topic
Market Dynamics and Volatility
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Machine Learning Approaches to Forecast the Realized Volatility of Crude Oil Prices

Pär Sjölander, Kristofer Månsson, Gazi Salah Uddin, Talha Omer
Journal of Forecasting
Market Dynamics and Volatility
article

Machine Learning Approaches to Forecast the Realized Volatility of Crude Oil Prices

Pär Sjölander, Kristofer Månsson, Gazi Salah Uddin, Talha Omer
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT This paper presents an evaluation of the accuracy of machine learning (ML) techniques in forecasting the realized volatility of West Texas Intermediate (WTI) crude oil prices. We compare several ML algorithms, including regularization, regression trees, random forests, and neural networks, to several heterogeneous autoregressive (HAR) models. The results show that the ML and regularization methods are efficient, even when there are only three predictors: daily, weekly, and monthly realized volatility (RV) lags. In addition, when the ML and regularization methods are applied, the results become more pronounced over longer forecasting horizons, as well as for weekly and monthly horizons. These ML methods are effective in approximating long‐term realized volatility. Furthermore, we found that additional explanatory variables for real‐time currency exchange contain valuable information to forecast the RV of crude oil prices.

Journal of Forecasting
Linköping University (SE), Linnaeus University (SE), Norwegian University of Life Sciences (NO), Jönköping University (SE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 84%
Market Dynamics and Volatility
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Machine Learning Approaches to Forecast the Realized Volatility of Crude Oil Prices — Pär Sjölander, Kristofer Månsson, et al. · Journal of Forecasting (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS