General Aspects of Identification, Prevention, and Protection From Medical Errors in Radiation Oncology

Medical errors represent an inherent risk in all areas of medicine, but in radiation oncology, they are of particular concern due to the complexity of treatment pathways and the potential severity of consequences. While legal systems often equate medical error with negligent treatment, clinicians typically view medical error as an unintended deviation occurring despite adherence to accepted standards of care. This conceptual discrepancy contributes to fear-driven practice, underreporting of adverse events, and missed opportunities for system-level learning. In this in-depth review, we synthesize current evidence on the definitions, mechanisms, and classification of medical errors, with a specific focus on radiation oncology. We critically analyze error patterns across pre-treatment, treatment, and post-treatment phases, emphasizing the interplay between human factors, system vulnerabilities, and technological complexity. Beyond technical considerations, this review provides a novel integrative perspective by linking guideline-based practice, incident learning systems, safety culture, communication strategies, and emerging artificial intelligence-assisted quality assurance approaches. Using Serbia as an illustrative example of a developing country, we highlight how legal frameworks centered predominantly on criminal liability, combined with high clinical workload and limited national reporting systems, may inadvertently discourage transparency and learning from errors. We propose a multidimensional safety framework that integrates protocol harmonization, non-punitive reporting, structured error disclosure, clinician support mechanisms, and advanced technological solutions. By shifting the focus from individual blame to system-based prevention and resolution, this review offers transferable insights for improving patient safety, enhancing clinician well-being and strengthening safety culture in radiation oncology across diverse healthcare settings.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Cureus
Published
2026-01-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.102098
Primary Topic
Advanced Radiotherapy Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

General Aspects of Identification, Prevention, and Protection From Medical Errors in Radiation Oncology

Marija Živković Radojević, Miloš Todorović, K. Bosnjakovic, Neda Milosavljević et al.
Cureus
Advanced Radiotherapy Techniques
article

General Aspects of Identification, Prevention, and Protection From Medical Errors in Radiation Oncology

Marija Živković Radojević, Miloš Todorović, K. Bosnjakovic, Neda Milosavljević, Milos Grujic
article en

Abstract

Medical errors represent an inherent risk in all areas of medicine, but in radiation oncology, they are of particular concern due to the complexity of treatment pathways and the potential severity of consequences. While legal systems often equate medical error with negligent treatment, clinicians typically view medical error as an unintended deviation occurring despite adherence to accepted standards of care. This conceptual discrepancy contributes to fear-driven practice, underreporting of adverse events, and missed opportunities for system-level learning. In this in-depth review, we synthesize current evidence on the definitions, mechanisms, and classification of medical errors, with a specific focus on radiation oncology. We critically analyze error patterns across pre-treatment, treatment, and post-treatment phases, emphasizing the interplay between human factors, system vulnerabilities, and technological complexity. Beyond technical considerations, this review provides a novel integrative perspective by linking guideline-based practice, incident learning systems, safety culture, communication strategies, and emerging artificial intelligence-assisted quality assurance approaches. Using Serbia as an illustrative example of a developing country, we highlight how legal frameworks centered predominantly on criminal liability, combined with high clinical workload and limited national reporting systems, may inadvertently discourage transparency and learning from errors. We propose a multidimensional safety framework that integrates protocol harmonization, non-punitive reporting, structured error disclosure, clinician support mechanisms, and advanced technological solutions. By shifting the focus from individual blame to system-based prevention and resolution, this review offers transferable insights for improving patient safety, enhancing clinician well-being and strengthening safety culture in radiation oncology across diverse healthcare settings.

CureusVol. 18(1)
University of Kragujevac (RS), Clinical Centre of Kragujevac (RS)
Partnerships for the goals
Openalex Percentile: Top 80%
Advanced Radiotherapy Techniques
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.