Does one week now prevent two weeks notice later? A longitudinal study of paid time off and employee retention

Purpose Employee resignation is expensive and burdensome for employers, and therefore, identifying ways to reduce turnover is a strategic initiative. We consider the relationship between an organization’s paid time off (PTO) policies and voluntary resignations within the framework of Conservation of Resources theory. Design/methodology/approach We use a longitudinal sample of employees from the National Longitudinal Survey of Youth, including more than 32,000 observations over 18 years, with logistic and fixed effect modeling. Findings Logistic regression results reveal that a low number (1–5) of paid days off per year has little effect on voluntary resignations. Yet there is a meaningful reduction in resignation for employees who received a moderate (6–10) or a high (11 or more) number of paid days off annually. Furthermore, while these findings were reflected in separate samples of men and women, we see women respond significantly more to higher levels of paid days off than men. Originality/value Previous research has not considered the magnitude of PTO and the association with voluntary turnover. Our data suggest one factor that may have led to the Great Resignation, PTO, is an enduring rather than fleeting business concern.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of strategy and management
Published
2026-01-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1108/jsma-02-2025-0059
Primary Topic
Work-Family Balance Challenges
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Does one week now prevent two weeks notice later? A longitudinal study of paid time off and employee retention

Vasilios D. Kosteas, LeaAnne DeRigne, Candice Vander Weerdt, Patricia Stoddard Dare
Journal of strategy and management
Work-Family Balance Challenges
article

Does one week now prevent two weeks notice later? A longitudinal study of paid time off and employee retention

Vasilios D. Kosteas, LeaAnne DeRigne, Candice Vander Weerdt, Patricia Stoddard Dare
article en

Abstract

Purpose Employee resignation is expensive and burdensome for employers, and therefore, identifying ways to reduce turnover is a strategic initiative. We consider the relationship between an organization’s paid time off (PTO) policies and voluntary resignations within the framework of Conservation of Resources theory. Design/methodology/approach We use a longitudinal sample of employees from the National Longitudinal Survey of Youth, including more than 32,000 observations over 18 years, with logistic and fixed effect modeling. Findings Logistic regression results reveal that a low number (1–5) of paid days off per year has little effect on voluntary resignations. Yet there is a meaningful reduction in resignation for employees who received a moderate (6–10) or a high (11 or more) number of paid days off annually. Furthermore, while these findings were reflected in separate samples of men and women, we see women respond significantly more to higher levels of paid days off than men. Originality/value Previous research has not considered the magnitude of PTO and the association with voluntary turnover. Our data suggest one factor that may have led to the Great Resignation, PTO, is an enduring rather than fleeting business concern.

Journal of strategy and management
Cleveland State University (US), Atlantic University (US), Florida Atlantic University (US)
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 83%
Work-Family Balance Challenges
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.