A systematic review of participatory research involving forensic mental health patients

There is currently limited information and guidance on utilising participatory research within forensic mental health settings. This systematic review aimed to explore the use of participatory research within those settings, identify helpful practices, barriers and challenges, as well as explore the impact reported of participatory research in research and knowledge production. Fourteen studies and eleven other types of publications have been identified from electronic databases, PsycINFO, PubMed, Embase, Web Of Science Core Collection, Google Scholar and ProQuest and hand searches of academic journals. Thematic analysis was used for synthesising data collected. Four themes were identified: (1) Building equal relationships, (2) Speaking the same language, (3) An involving system, (4) Impact for all. Analysis showed that the use of participatory research in such settings relies on human interaction and equal co-production within commonly restrictive and coercive environments. The complexity of participatory research is also reflected in its reporting. A standardised (but also flexible) model of reporting would be valuable for future research. In addition to summarizing the findings of research in this area, we have compiled a list of ‘active ingredients’ for the successful use of participatory research in forensic mental health settings.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BMC Psychiatry
Published
2026-01-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12888-026-07813-8
Primary Topic
Mental Health and Patient Involvement
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A systematic review of participatory research involving forensic mental health patients

Stefan Johannes Teipel, Marcel Daum, Peggy Walde, Birgit Vӧllm et al.
BMC Psychiatry
Mental Health and Patient Involvement
article

A systematic review of participatory research involving forensic mental health patients

Stefan Johannes Teipel, Marcel Daum, Peggy Walde, Birgit Vӧllm, Eva Drewelow, Fenia Ferra, Olga Biernetzky
article en

Abstract

There is currently limited information and guidance on utilising participatory research within forensic mental health settings. This systematic review aimed to explore the use of participatory research within those settings, identify helpful practices, barriers and challenges, as well as explore the impact reported of participatory research in research and knowledge production. Fourteen studies and eleven other types of publications have been identified from electronic databases, PsycINFO, PubMed, Embase, Web Of Science Core Collection, Google Scholar and ProQuest and hand searches of academic journals. Thematic analysis was used for synthesising data collected. Four themes were identified: (1) Building equal relationships, (2) Speaking the same language, (3) An involving system, (4) Impact for all. Analysis showed that the use of participatory research in such settings relies on human interaction and equal co-production within commonly restrictive and coercive environments. The complexity of participatory research is also reflected in its reporting. A standardised (but also flexible) model of reporting would be valuable for future research. In addition to summarizing the findings of research in this area, we have compiled a list of ‘active ingredients’ for the successful use of participatory research in forensic mental health settings.

BMC PsychiatryVol. 26(1)
German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DE), University of Rostock (DE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 83%
Mental Health and Patient Involvement
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.