Surgeons’ Experiences and Perspectives on Physical Ergonomics: A Need for Innovative Solutions
BackgroundPain that impacts professional and personal life are prevalent among surgeons due to poor ergonomics. The objective of this study is to determine the attitudes, perceptions, and real-world practices of ergonomics with the ultimate goal of deriving novel solutions.MethodsA survey was distributed to surgical faculty/trainees at a single institution. 43 attendings and 116 trainees were invited to participate. Data on demographics, pain experiences, ergonomic practices and attitudes, and perceived barriers to implementing ergonomic principles were ascertained.ResultsOf surveyed surgeons, 18 attendings and 11 trainees responded. 46.7% of surgeons experienced pain, particularly in the neck and back. Although most respondents made adjustments, challenges such as insufficient training, lack of proper equipment and/or instruments, and resistance from others were frequently encountered or anticipated. Most believed ergonomics improves outcomes and an interest in ergonomic training was noted.ConclusionsMany surgeons experience pain and are interested in improving ergonomics. Addressing barriers to improvement could potentially foster better practices, reduce strain on surgeons, decrease pain and injuries, increase surgeon well-being, and potentially improve patient outcomes. Further studies and innovative solutions are needed to address this problem.
Authors
- Katherine Fay (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7109-2000)
- Sruthi Kunamneni (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6443-6079)
- Wei Wei Zhang (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9122-2850)
- Riya Sutariya
- Nisha Narula
- Mazen Al-Mansour
Institutions
- Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey (US)
- Emory University (US)
- University of Florida (US)
- Rutgers New Jersey Medical School (US)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Surgical Innovation
- Published
- 2026-01-23
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1177/15533506261420368
- Primary Topic
- Surgical Simulation and Training
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00