Review of Termination for Default Provisions in Standard Contract Forms and Drafting, Administrative, and Operational Considerations for Contractors and Owners

A contract termination for default (T-for-D) is a drastic remedy that an owner maintains against a contractor under standard construction contract forms. An owner can default-terminate a contractor based on significant breaches of contractual obligations that remain either uncured or lack a proper plan for a cure after the issuance of a notice of default letter. The cure period is a preestablished period of time during which the contractor has one last opportunity to fix or plan to fix a material default. The propriety of a T-for-D is often challenged by the terminated party in litigation or arbitration. This paper begins by identifying nontermination remedies that owners should consider prior to issuance of a T-for-D. Next, it includes an in-depth comparison and review of T-for-D provisions for three standard owner-contractor contract forms, which establishes that the terminable events are largely consistent between the forms, but the cure procedures and cure durations vary from form to form which establishes that the terminable events are largely consistent between the forms, but the cure procedures and cure durations vary from form to form. Also, it provides an analysis of T-for-D requirements in performance bond forms associated with the noted owner-contractor contract forms; thus, on bonded projects, owners must understand and follow the prescriptive T-for-D requirements of both documents. Based on the results of these three analyses the authors offer drafting recommendations for owners and contractors on termination sections of standard contract forms and provide other administrative and operational considerations for owners and contractors that are navigating a potential, current, or past T-for-D.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Legal Affairs and Dispute Resolution in Engineering and Construction
Published
2026-01-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1061/jladah.ladr-1439
Primary Topic
Construction Project Management and Performance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Review of Termination for Default Provisions in Standard Contract Forms and Drafting, Administrative, and Operational Considerations for Contractors and Owners

W. H. McConnell, Caroline M. Clevenger
Journal of Legal Affairs and Dispute Resolution in Engineering and Construction
Construction Project Management and Performance
article

Review of Termination for Default Provisions in Standard Contract Forms and Drafting, Administrative, and Operational Considerations for Contractors and Owners

W. H. McConnell, Caroline M. Clevenger
article en

Abstract

A contract termination for default (T-for-D) is a drastic remedy that an owner maintains against a contractor under standard construction contract forms. An owner can default-terminate a contractor based on significant breaches of contractual obligations that remain either uncured or lack a proper plan for a cure after the issuance of a notice of default letter. The cure period is a preestablished period of time during which the contractor has one last opportunity to fix or plan to fix a material default. The propriety of a T-for-D is often challenged by the terminated party in litigation or arbitration. This paper begins by identifying nontermination remedies that owners should consider prior to issuance of a T-for-D. Next, it includes an in-depth comparison and review of T-for-D provisions for three standard owner-contractor contract forms, which establishes that the terminable events are largely consistent between the forms, but the cure procedures and cure durations vary from form to form which establishes that the terminable events are largely consistent between the forms, but the cure procedures and cure durations vary from form to form. Also, it provides an analysis of T-for-D requirements in performance bond forms associated with the noted owner-contractor contract forms; thus, on bonded projects, owners must understand and follow the prescriptive T-for-D requirements of both documents. Based on the results of these three analyses the authors offer drafting recommendations for owners and contractors on termination sections of standard contract forms and provide other administrative and operational considerations for owners and contractors that are navigating a potential, current, or past T-for-D.

Journal of Legal Affairs and Dispute Resolution in Engineering and ConstructionVol. 18(2)
TRC Companies (United States) (US), Vertex Pharmaceuticals (United States) (US), University of Colorado Denver (US)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 82%
Construction Project Management and Performance
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.