Empowering university EFL learners through peer review

This study focuses on a teaching practice intended to empower students and support their success; namely peer review (Woodward, 2015; Massery, 2013). Here, peer review is implemented with a group of 16 third-year French-speaking undergraduate students enrolled in an English studies programme. We hypothesize that a peer review process prior to the final evaluation (a ten-minute oral presentation with a slideshow) serves to enhance students’ understanding of the assessment criteria (made explicit through the use of a checklist) and contributes to improving the quality of their initial work. The results show that: (i) students tend to underrate their own productions and overrate those of their partners; (ii) they integrate more assessment criteria and revise their work accordingly; (iii) their second self-evaluation procedure aligns more closely with the teacher’s final evaluation procedure; (iv) they report experiencing a “mirror effect” in the way they revise their work.

Publication Details

Journal
Industrias Culturais (Universidade de Coimbra)
Published
2025-12-05
Primary Topic
Student Assessment and Feedback
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Empowering university EFL learners through peer review

Industrias Culturais (Universidade de Coimbra)
Student Assessment and Feedback
article

Empowering university EFL learners through peer review

article en

Abstract

This study focuses on a teaching practice intended to empower students and support their success; namely peer review (Woodward, 2015; Massery, 2013). Here, peer review is implemented with a group of 16 third-year French-speaking undergraduate students enrolled in an English studies programme. We hypothesize that a peer review process prior to the final evaluation (a ten-minute oral presentation with a slideshow) serves to enhance students’ understanding of the assessment criteria (made explicit through the use of a checklist) and contributes to improving the quality of their initial work. The results show that: (i) students tend to underrate their own productions and overrate those of their partners; (ii) they integrate more assessment criteria and revise their work accordingly; (iii) their second self-evaluation procedure aligns more closely with the teacher’s final evaluation procedure; (iv) they report experiencing a “mirror effect” in the way they revise their work.

Industrias Culturais (Universidade de Coimbra)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Student Assessment and Feedback
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.