GOVERNANCE PRACTICES IN SAUDI HIGHER EDUCATION INSTITUTIONS: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW

This study aims to provide a systematic review of Saudi literature on governance in higher education institutions during 2000–2025, focusing on the extent of implementationof governance principles and the research methodologies used to examine them. The study adopted a structured literature review approach based on explicit selection criteria, including direct relevance to the Saudi higher education sector,publication in recognized scholarly databases, and publication recency. Applying these criteria identified 10 studies that investigated governance in higher education from organizational, administrative, and academic perspectives.The findings indicate that the overall level of governance implementation in Saudi higher education remains moderate across universities, colleges, and academic departments. A relatively stronger implementation was observed in dimensions related to fairness, performance improvement, and participatory decision-making, whereas transparency, accountability, and institutional autonomy were the least operationalized and weakest. The review further reveals that most studies relied on descriptive survey designs and questionnaire-based measurement tools tocapture the perceptions of academic leaders and faculty members, with a notable scarcity of qualitative, longitudinal, or comparative research capable of interpreting governance dynamics at a deeper institutional level. The study concludes that advancing the understanding and practice of governance requires methodological diversification and stronger operational implementation within the Saudi university environment.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2026-01-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18337291
Primary Topic
Socioeconomic Development in MENA
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

GOVERNANCE PRACTICES IN SAUDI HIGHER EDUCATION INSTITUTIONS: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW

Dr. Saud Ghassan Albeshir
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Socioeconomic Development in MENA
article

GOVERNANCE PRACTICES IN SAUDI HIGHER EDUCATION INSTITUTIONS: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW

Dr. Saud Ghassan Albeshir
article en

Abstract

This study aims to provide a systematic review of Saudi literature on governance in higher education institutions during 2000–2025, focusing on the extent of implementationof governance principles and the research methodologies used to examine them. The study adopted a structured literature review approach based on explicit selection criteria, including direct relevance to the Saudi higher education sector,publication in recognized scholarly databases, and publication recency. Applying these criteria identified 10 studies that investigated governance in higher education from organizational, administrative, and academic perspectives.The findings indicate that the overall level of governance implementation in Saudi higher education remains moderate across universities, colleges, and academic departments. A relatively stronger implementation was observed in dimensions related to fairness, performance improvement, and participatory decision-making, whereas transparency, accountability, and institutional autonomy were the least operationalized and weakest. The review further reveals that most studies relied on descriptive survey designs and questionnaire-based measurement tools tocapture the perceptions of academic leaders and faculty members, with a notable scarcity of qualitative, longitudinal, or comparative research capable of interpreting governance dynamics at a deeper institutional level. The study concludes that advancing the understanding and practice of governance requires methodological diversification and stronger operational implementation within the Saudi university environment.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
King Saud University (SA)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 83%
Socioeconomic Development in MENA
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.