A systematic review and meta-analysis results of applying evidence-based practices on emergency surgery patients

Background: Care bundles, which are groups of evidence-based practices, have been extensively utilized to improve patient outcomes across various clinical environments. However, the exact impact of these bundles on mortality and complication rates in emergency abdominal surgery has not been thoroughly evaluated.Study Aim: This meta-analysis aims to evaluate the efficacy of applying evidence-based practices in reducing mortality and complication rates in patients undergoing emergency abdominal surgeries. Methodology: A thorough literature search was performed across PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases to identify studies assessing the effects of care bundles on outcomes in emergency abdominal surgeries. Included studies needed to report on mortality or complication rates for patients undergoing emergency surgery with and without the application of care bundles. Data were extracted and pooled using a fixed-effects model to compute the overall odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for both mortality and complication rates. Results: Fifteen studies were included in the meta-analysis. The pooled analysis indicated a significant decrease in mortality rates for the bundle group compared to the control group, with an odds ratio (OR) of 0.76 (95% CI: 0.68 to 0.85). Similarly, complication rates were also substantially lower in the bundle group, with a pooled OR of 0.77 (95% CI: 0.68 to 0.89). The heterogeneity for mortality (I² = 33%) and complication rates (I² = 29%) was minimal, suggesting consistent results across the studies. Conclusion: The application of care bundles in emergency abdominal surgical settings is linked to a notable decrease in both mortality and complication rates. These results advocate for wider adoption of care bundles to improve patient outcomes in high-risk emergency surgeries. Future research should aim to conduct randomized controlled trials and assess the cost-effectiveness of care bundles in various healthcare environments.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2025-12-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18336411
Primary Topic
Cardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A systematic review and meta-analysis results of applying evidence-based practices on emergency surgery patients

Abdullah Ali Hussain Awaji, Hassan Y Alzahrani, Abdulrahman A Almarshad, Abdulaziz A Alghafees et al.
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Cardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes
article

A systematic review and meta-analysis results of applying evidence-based practices on emergency surgery patients

Abdullah Ali Hussain Awaji, Hassan Y Alzahrani, Abdulrahman A Almarshad, Abdulaziz A Alghafees, Saud A Alshihri, Rakan S Alghomaiz, Saleh M Alzahrani, Khalid A Zailay
article en

Abstract

Background: Care bundles, which are groups of evidence-based practices, have been extensively utilized to improve patient outcomes across various clinical environments. However, the exact impact of these bundles on mortality and complication rates in emergency abdominal surgery has not been thoroughly evaluated.Study Aim: This meta-analysis aims to evaluate the efficacy of applying evidence-based practices in reducing mortality and complication rates in patients undergoing emergency abdominal surgeries. Methodology: A thorough literature search was performed across PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases to identify studies assessing the effects of care bundles on outcomes in emergency abdominal surgeries. Included studies needed to report on mortality or complication rates for patients undergoing emergency surgery with and without the application of care bundles. Data were extracted and pooled using a fixed-effects model to compute the overall odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for both mortality and complication rates. Results: Fifteen studies were included in the meta-analysis. The pooled analysis indicated a significant decrease in mortality rates for the bundle group compared to the control group, with an odds ratio (OR) of 0.76 (95% CI: 0.68 to 0.85). Similarly, complication rates were also substantially lower in the bundle group, with a pooled OR of 0.77 (95% CI: 0.68 to 0.89). The heterogeneity for mortality (I² = 33%) and complication rates (I² = 29%) was minimal, suggesting consistent results across the studies. Conclusion: The application of care bundles in emergency abdominal surgical settings is linked to a notable decrease in both mortality and complication rates. These results advocate for wider adoption of care bundles to improve patient outcomes in high-risk emergency surgeries. Future research should aim to conduct randomized controlled trials and assess the cost-effectiveness of care bundles in various healthcare environments.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
King Fahd Security College (SA), Riyadh Elm University (SA), Italian Society of Periodontology and Implantology (IT), University of Modern Sciences (AE), Dammam Central Hospital (SA)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 29%
Cardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.