Assessing and Optimizing Urban Dynamic Resilience to Extreme Rainfall from Shock to Recovery

Abstract Climate change has intensified extreme rainfall events, challenging progress toward SDG 11’s urban resilience targets. Current assessment methods often neglect dynamic recovery processes and regional precipitation disparities. We propose a three-phase framework combining interpretable machine learning (ML) and factorial experiments, using the Prep_shock index that integrates standardized rainfall intensity, capital exposure, and historical probability, to evaluate the dynamic resilience of 220+ Chinese cities from 2019 to 2022. Key findings reveal that: (1) The Prep_shock index effectively eliminates north-south precipitation biases, identifying Shandong coastal cities and Yangtze River Delta city clusters (36.2%) as high-resilience areas, in contrast to Henan Province. COVID-19 exacerbated systemic risks in megacities, undermining their capital protection capacities. (2) Spatial diagnostics classify 75.6% of the cities into Quadrant III (the balanced resilience category), with recovery times decreasing from the west to the east. Super-large cities like Zhengzhou (2021) exhibited critical recovery deficiencies (Quadrant IV). (3) Interpretable ML models (XGBoost/EBM) identify redundancy as the dominant resilience driver—robustness governs baseline resilience, while recovery relies on emergency support (for example, hospital beds density and fiscal inputs) and redundant infrastructure (for example, road network density). (4) Factorial experiments reveal optimization trade-offs: simultaneous enhancement of rapidity and redundancy diminishes their individual benefits, necessitating context-specific prioritization. The study advances dynamic resilience assessment methods and proposes quadrant-specific strategies for tailored urban adaptation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Disaster Risk Science
Published
2026-01-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s13753-025-00683-w
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Infrastructure Resilience and Vulnerability Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
19.37

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Assessing and Optimizing Urban Dynamic Resilience to Extreme Rainfall from Shock to Recovery

Loon Ching Tang, Yi Ren, Jidong Wu, Linmei Zhuang et al.
1 citations
International Journal of Disaster Risk Science
Infrastructure Resilience and Vulnerability Analysis
19.37
article

Assessing and Optimizing Urban Dynamic Resilience to Extreme Rainfall from Shock to Recovery

Loon Ching Tang, Yi Ren, Jidong Wu, Linmei Zhuang, Jiawang Zhang, Dingde Xu, Ming Wang, Jiarui Yang, Kai Liu, Junfei Liu, Dong Xu
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Abstract Climate change has intensified extreme rainfall events, challenging progress toward SDG 11’s urban resilience targets. Current assessment methods often neglect dynamic recovery processes and regional precipitation disparities. We propose a three-phase framework combining interpretable machine learning (ML) and factorial experiments, using the Prep_shock index that integrates standardized rainfall intensity, capital exposure, and historical probability, to evaluate the dynamic resilience of 220+ Chinese cities from 2019 to 2022. Key findings reveal that: (1) The Prep_shock index effectively eliminates north-south precipitation biases, identifying Shandong coastal cities and Yangtze River Delta city clusters (36.2%) as high-resilience areas, in contrast to Henan Province. COVID-19 exacerbated systemic risks in megacities, undermining their capital protection capacities. (2) Spatial diagnostics classify 75.6% of the cities into Quadrant III (the balanced resilience category), with recovery times decreasing from the west to the east. Super-large cities like Zhengzhou (2021) exhibited critical recovery deficiencies (Quadrant IV). (3) Interpretable ML models (XGBoost/EBM) identify redundancy as the dominant resilience driver—robustness governs baseline resilience, while recovery relies on emergency support (for example, hospital beds density and fiscal inputs) and redundant infrastructure (for example, road network density). (4) Factorial experiments reveal optimization trade-offs: simultaneous enhancement of rapidity and redundancy diminishes their individual benefits, necessitating context-specific prioritization. The study advances dynamic resilience assessment methods and proposes quadrant-specific strategies for tailored urban adaptation.

International Journal of Disaster Risk ScienceVol. 17(1)
National University of Singapore (SG), Beijing Normal University (CN), Sichuan Agricultural University (CN), Sichuan Normal University (CN)
National Natural Science Foundation of China, Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Infrastructure Resilience and Vulnerability Analysis
19.37
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.