Public Knowledge, Attitude and Practice towards Wound Care in the Saudi Western Region: A Cross-sectional Study

Introduction: Wound care knowledge deficits in general populations can lead to preventable complications and increased healthcare burden. This study assessed wound care Knowledge, Attitude, and Practices (KAPs) among Saudi Western region residents, identifying demographic predictors and risk groups requiring targeted interventions. Methods: A cross-sectional survey was conducted, and data were collected between January 2023 and March 2023 using a validated questionnaire. Participants aged ≥18 years were recruited through convenience sampling ( n = 752, response rate 75.2%). Knowledge scores were calculated as percentages, with demographic associations analysed using Cohen’s d effect sizes. Multiple testing corrections employed a Benjamini-Hochberg false discovery rate (FDR) adjustment. Risk stratification models were developed using area under the curve (AUC) receiver operating characteristic curves. Results: The mean knowledge score was 46.7% ± 15.2%, with only 7.8% achieving high knowledge (≥70%). Multiple significant gaps were observed, and they included tetanus injection awareness (20.5% correct) and antibiotic misconceptions (70.2% incorrect). Education level (Cohen’s d = 1.254, FDR P < 0.004) and occupation ( d = 1.308, FDR P < 0.008) were found to be significant predictors after correction. Risk stratification identified 7.2% high-risk participants (mainly primary education and military sector) with 2.89–4.55 times higher likelihood of poor knowledge. Protected groups (16.0%) included health sector employees demonstrating superior performance (AUC = 0.815–0.865). Conclusions: Based on this study’s findings, there are multiple knowledge deficits that exist across the population, with education and occupation as key determinants. The identification of high-risk groups (7.2%) requiring immediate intervention and moderate-risk groups (46.5%) needing targeted education provides an evidence-based framework for public health initiatives addressing wound care literacy.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Advanced Trends in Medical Research
Published
2025-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.4103/atmr.atmr_166_25
Primary Topic
Wound Healing and Treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Public Knowledge, Attitude and Practice towards Wound Care in the Saudi Western Region: A Cross-sectional Study

Khloud A Alharbi, Reem H. Alzubaidi, Ahmed M. Alsubhi, Sara Z. Alessa et al.
Journal of Advanced Trends in Medical Research
Wound Healing and Treatments
article

Public Knowledge, Attitude and Practice towards Wound Care in the Saudi Western Region: A Cross-sectional Study

Khloud A Alharbi, Reem H. Alzubaidi, Ahmed M. Alsubhi, Sara Z. Alessa, Kholoud M. Alzubaidi, Rahaf Y. Aljulaymi, Safa Hamdy Alkalash, Fatimah H. Alshihabi
article en

Abstract

Introduction: Wound care knowledge deficits in general populations can lead to preventable complications and increased healthcare burden. This study assessed wound care Knowledge, Attitude, and Practices (KAPs) among Saudi Western region residents, identifying demographic predictors and risk groups requiring targeted interventions. Methods: A cross-sectional survey was conducted, and data were collected between January 2023 and March 2023 using a validated questionnaire. Participants aged ≥18 years were recruited through convenience sampling ( n = 752, response rate 75.2%). Knowledge scores were calculated as percentages, with demographic associations analysed using Cohen’s d effect sizes. Multiple testing corrections employed a Benjamini-Hochberg false discovery rate (FDR) adjustment. Risk stratification models were developed using area under the curve (AUC) receiver operating characteristic curves. Results: The mean knowledge score was 46.7% ± 15.2%, with only 7.8% achieving high knowledge (≥70%). Multiple significant gaps were observed, and they included tetanus injection awareness (20.5% correct) and antibiotic misconceptions (70.2% incorrect). Education level (Cohen’s d = 1.254, FDR P < 0.004) and occupation ( d = 1.308, FDR P < 0.008) were found to be significant predictors after correction. Risk stratification identified 7.2% high-risk participants (mainly primary education and military sector) with 2.89–4.55 times higher likelihood of poor knowledge. Protected groups (16.0%) included health sector employees demonstrating superior performance (AUC = 0.815–0.865). Conclusions: Based on this study’s findings, there are multiple knowledge deficits that exist across the population, with education and occupation as key determinants. The identification of high-risk groups (7.2%) requiring immediate intervention and moderate-risk groups (46.5%) needing targeted education provides an evidence-based framework for public health initiatives addressing wound care literacy.

Journal of Advanced Trends in Medical ResearchVol. 2(4)
King Abdulaziz University (SA), Umm al-Qura University (SA), Menoufia University (EG)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 29%
Wound Healing and Treatments
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.