Exergy, energy and emissions analyses of biodiesel-diesel blends in a diesel engine

The aim of the research is to determine how well a single-cylinder, four-stroke (SCFS) dieselengine performs when combining Mahua oil methyl ester (MOME) with diesel. Utilizing B20 (a 4:1 ratioof diesel to MOME by volume), the analysis of energy, energy, and emissions was performed. Accordingto research, diesel produced 5.99% and 10.87% more fuel energy intake and energy that was forciblyevacuated by exhaust gases than B20. The unanticipated losses in the diesel scenario were 9.25% higherthan in the B20 scenario. Although the energy efficiency for diesel was 27.22%, the overall losses were71.95%. B20’s efficiency was 64.47% more than that of diesel. Diesel oil is 1.33% more readily availableas an input than B20, according to the exergy research. Comparing diesel to B20, the former had 5.33times more exhaust pollutants and 31.12% less braking power availability. Diesel’s destruction rate is0.96% lower than B20’s. In terms of energy, energy expenditure, and emissions, B20 is found to be quitecomparable to diesel.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Transactions on Energy Systems and Engineering Applications
Published
2026-01-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.32397/tesea.vol6.n2.709
Primary Topic
Biodiesel Production and Applications
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Exergy, energy and emissions analyses of biodiesel-diesel blends in a diesel engine

Prashant Kumar Jangde, AJAY KUMAR SHARMA, Devendra Pratap Singh, PRADEEP PATANWAR
Transactions on Energy Systems and Engineering Applications
Biodiesel Production and Applications
article

Exergy, energy and emissions analyses of biodiesel-diesel blends in a diesel engine

Prashant Kumar Jangde, AJAY KUMAR SHARMA, Devendra Pratap Singh, PRADEEP PATANWAR
article en

Abstract

The aim of the research is to determine how well a single-cylinder, four-stroke (SCFS) dieselengine performs when combining Mahua oil methyl ester (MOME) with diesel. Utilizing B20 (a 4:1 ratioof diesel to MOME by volume), the analysis of energy, energy, and emissions was performed. Accordingto research, diesel produced 5.99% and 10.87% more fuel energy intake and energy that was forciblyevacuated by exhaust gases than B20. The unanticipated losses in the diesel scenario were 9.25% higherthan in the B20 scenario. Although the energy efficiency for diesel was 27.22%, the overall losses were71.95%. B20’s efficiency was 64.47% more than that of diesel. Diesel oil is 1.33% more readily availableas an input than B20, according to the exergy research. Comparing diesel to B20, the former had 5.33times more exhaust pollutants and 31.12% less braking power availability. Diesel’s destruction rate is0.96% lower than B20’s. In terms of energy, energy expenditure, and emissions, B20 is found to be quitecomparable to diesel.

Transactions on Energy Systems and Engineering ApplicationsVol. 6(2)
Affordable and clean energy
Openalex Percentile: Top 80%
Biodiesel Production and Applications
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.