Comparative evaluation of direct and digital measurements of peri-implant defects using CBCT, ultrasound, and intraoral scanning
CBCT showed the highest agreement with direct measurements, followed by US, while IOS exhibited greater variability. Defect type and measurement modality were the primary determinants of accuracy. These findings indicate that CBCT and US can be considered reliable tools for assessing peri-implant bone defects.
Authors
- Kıvanç Kamburoğlu (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4134-5756)
- Mahmure Ayşe Tayman (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8924-6725)
- Esra Ece Çakmak
Institutions
- Ankara University (TR)
- Etimesgut Asker Hastanesi (TR)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Dentomaxillofacial Radiology
- Published
- 2026-01-21
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1093/dmfr/twag006
- Primary Topic
- Dental Implant Techniques and Outcomes
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00