Juvenile Records Negatively Impact Mock‐Hiring Decisions: An Examination of the Mismatch Between Record Disclosure and Background Check

Abstract Many states have juvenile record sealing policies to allow formerly justice‐involved juveniles to successfully re‐enter society as adults. However, these policies are often not enforced consistently and transparently, creating inconsistencies between what the person discloses on a job application and what appears on their background check (i.e., a mismatch). We hypothesized that juvenile records would negatively influence hiring outcomes of adult applicants, especially when there was a mismatch between the background check and disclosure. We also hypothesized the effects would be worse for Black applicants. We used a mock‐hiring survey paradigm, where 1054 participants made a hiring decision about a job applicant. As expected, juvenile records negatively influenced hiring outcomes, especially when there was a mismatch. Applicants were less likely to be hired when their disclosure of their record did not match the background check. We did not find support for the effects being worse for Black applicants. These results indicate that it is important to have juvenile record sealing policies to promote successful re‐entry as adults and underline the importance of the policies being enforced transparently and consistently. Without transparent and consistent enforcement, these policies can backfire and cause more harm to the formerly justice‐involved juveniles.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Analyses of Social Issues and Public Policy
Published
2026-01-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/asap.70051
Primary Topic
Names, Identity, and Discrimination Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Juvenile Records Negatively Impact Mock‐Hiring Decisions: An Examination of the Mismatch Between Record Disclosure and Background Check

M Wagner, Krystia Reed
Analyses of Social Issues and Public Policy
Names, Identity, and Discrimination Research
article

Juvenile Records Negatively Impact Mock‐Hiring Decisions: An Examination of the Mismatch Between Record Disclosure and Background Check

M Wagner, Krystia Reed
article en

Abstract

Abstract Many states have juvenile record sealing policies to allow formerly justice‐involved juveniles to successfully re‐enter society as adults. However, these policies are often not enforced consistently and transparently, creating inconsistencies between what the person discloses on a job application and what appears on their background check (i.e., a mismatch). We hypothesized that juvenile records would negatively influence hiring outcomes of adult applicants, especially when there was a mismatch between the background check and disclosure. We also hypothesized the effects would be worse for Black applicants. We used a mock‐hiring survey paradigm, where 1054 participants made a hiring decision about a job applicant. As expected, juvenile records negatively influenced hiring outcomes, especially when there was a mismatch. Applicants were less likely to be hired when their disclosure of their record did not match the background check. We did not find support for the effects being worse for Black applicants. These results indicate that it is important to have juvenile record sealing policies to promote successful re‐entry as adults and underline the importance of the policies being enforced transparently and consistently. Without transparent and consistent enforcement, these policies can backfire and cause more harm to the formerly justice‐involved juveniles.

Analyses of Social Issues and Public PolicyVol. 26(1)
The University of Texas at El Paso (US)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 84%
Names, Identity, and Discrimination Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.