For Real?—Epistemic Trust Within Online Environments and the Lures of Conspiracy Thinking

Abstract This paper examines how interactions within online environments affect the experience of shared reality by eroding trust. Trust has often been described as the ‘glue’ of society, essential not only for personal relationships, groups, and institutions but also for the very fabric of shared reality. One of its forms, epistemic trust, is of particular importance as it concerns the acquisition, acceptance, and establishment of shared knowledge, as well as the dynamics that sustain it. As online environments reshape our social interactions, they also modify significant conditions for epistemic trust—its requirements, incentives, and challenges. The aim of the paper is to illustrate these modifications, showcasing how online environments affect the various dimensions of epistemic trust that significantly shape how we experience shared reality. The paper unfolds in four steps. First, we present and discuss central cognitive and affective dimensions of epistemic trust and illustrate how it forms an inextricable aspect of social life and our sense of a shared reality (“Section 1: Epistemic trust and the experience of shared reality”). Second, we briefly present and discuss the phenomenon of conspiracy theories (“Section 2: The case of conspiracy theories”), and argue that their central features amount to a significant modification of our practices of epistemic trust (“Section 3: Epistemic trust and the experience of shared reality in the context of conspiracy theories”). Against this backdrop, we finally suggest that structural and phenomenological features of online environments can create epistemic scenarios that increase susceptibility to conspiratory mentalities and corresponding epistemic trust dynamics. We conclude that online environments may challenge our sense of a shared reality by shifting our propensities for epistemic trust (“Section 4: How online environments favor the development of conspiracy thinking”).

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Human Studies
Published
2026-01-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10746-025-09830-0
Primary Topic
Misinformation and Its Impacts
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

For Real?—Epistemic Trust Within Online Environments and the Lures of Conspiracy Thinking

Daniel Vespermann, Hannes Gustav Melichar, Thomas Fuchs, Philipp Schmidt-Boddy
Human Studies
Misinformation and Its Impacts
article

For Real?—Epistemic Trust Within Online Environments and the Lures of Conspiracy Thinking

Daniel Vespermann, Hannes Gustav Melichar, Thomas Fuchs, Philipp Schmidt-Boddy
article en

Abstract

Abstract This paper examines how interactions within online environments affect the experience of shared reality by eroding trust. Trust has often been described as the ‘glue’ of society, essential not only for personal relationships, groups, and institutions but also for the very fabric of shared reality. One of its forms, epistemic trust, is of particular importance as it concerns the acquisition, acceptance, and establishment of shared knowledge, as well as the dynamics that sustain it. As online environments reshape our social interactions, they also modify significant conditions for epistemic trust—its requirements, incentives, and challenges. The aim of the paper is to illustrate these modifications, showcasing how online environments affect the various dimensions of epistemic trust that significantly shape how we experience shared reality. The paper unfolds in four steps. First, we present and discuss central cognitive and affective dimensions of epistemic trust and illustrate how it forms an inextricable aspect of social life and our sense of a shared reality (“Section 1: Epistemic trust and the experience of shared reality”). Second, we briefly present and discuss the phenomenon of conspiracy theories (“Section 2: The case of conspiracy theories”), and argue that their central features amount to a significant modification of our practices of epistemic trust (“Section 3: Epistemic trust and the experience of shared reality in the context of conspiracy theories”). Against this backdrop, we finally suggest that structural and phenomenological features of online environments can create epistemic scenarios that increase susceptibility to conspiratory mentalities and corresponding epistemic trust dynamics. We conclude that online environments may challenge our sense of a shared reality by shifting our propensities for epistemic trust (“Section 4: How online environments favor the development of conspiracy thinking”).

Human Studies
Heidelberg University (DE), University Hospital Heidelberg (DE)
Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 84%
Misinformation and Its Impacts
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.