Diagnostic value of blood culture growth patterns in distinguishing contaminants from pathogens

Blood culture contamination is common, causing diagnostic uncertainty and unnecessary antibiotic use. Analyzing growth patterns within culture sets might offer diagnostic value. We retrospectively analyzed peripheral blood culture sets from 2019 and 2024. Growth pattern (one bottle [discordant] vs both bottles [concordant]) was analyzed according to clinical significance (contaminant vs true pathogen). Overall, 38,216 blood culture sets were analyzed, including 1,491 (3.9%) discordant and 1,938 (5.1%) concordant sets (remaining 34,787 [91.0%] sets were sterile). Discordant sets grew 1,060/1,491 (71.1%) contaminants and 431/1,491 (28.9%) true pathogens. Concordant sets grew 222/1,938 (11.4%) contaminants and 1,716/1,938 (88.5%) true pathogens (<i>P</i> < 0.001). Examining coagulase-negative staphylococci (CoNS) only (2019 data set), 629/642 (98.0%) discordant sets grew contaminants, while 13/642 (2.0%) grew true pathogens. In contrast, <i>Staphylococcus aureus</i> grew in only 82/270 (30.4%) discordant sets. Among 858 first CoNS-positive cultures per patient, 624/636 (98.1%) discordant sets grew contaminants, and 12/636 (1.9%) grew CoNS defined as a true pathogen. The negative predictive value of a discordant first CoNS set to exclude true CoNS bacteremia was 98.1% (95% confidence interval 96.7%-98.9%). Examining aerobic vs anaerobic bottles in 356 discordant sets, contaminants were found more frequently in aerobic bottles (135/356, 37.9% vs 73/356, 20.5%, <i>P</i> = 0.04). The proportion of true pathogens was similar in both (79/356, 22.2% vs 69/356, 19.4%, <i>P =</i> 0.4). Discordant CoNS-positive cultures were strongly associated with contamination. This could assist in interpreting blood culture results and supporting antimicrobial stewardship. Discordance might result from a diversion effect, the aerobic bottle acting as a diversion device for the anaerobic bottle.IMPORTANCERapidly distinguishing blood culture contaminants from true pathogens is essential for optimizing antimicrobial stewardship and avoiding unnecessary antibiotic therapy. In this large, two-period study, we demonstrate that discordant growth of coagulase-negative staphylococci in a two-bottle set has a negative predictive value of 98.1% for true bacteremia. This finding remained robust across both study years and when restricted to first positive cultures, highlighting its reliability. Incorporating simple growth pattern analysis into early blood culture interpretation can provide clinicians with reliable and timely information within 24 hours, supporting more targeted and judicious antibiotic use.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Clinical Microbiology
Published
2026-01-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1128/jcm.01210-25
Primary Topic
Bacterial Identification and Susceptibility Testing
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Diagnostic value of blood culture growth patterns in distinguishing contaminants from pathogens

Yigal Helviz, Phillip D. Levin
Journal of Clinical Microbiology
Bacterial Identification and Susceptibility Testing
article

Diagnostic value of blood culture growth patterns in distinguishing contaminants from pathogens

Yigal Helviz, Phillip D. Levin
article en

Abstract

Blood culture contamination is common, causing diagnostic uncertainty and unnecessary antibiotic use. Analyzing growth patterns within culture sets might offer diagnostic value. We retrospectively analyzed peripheral blood culture sets from 2019 and 2024. Growth pattern (one bottle [discordant] vs both bottles [concordant]) was analyzed according to clinical significance (contaminant vs true pathogen). Overall, 38,216 blood culture sets were analyzed, including 1,491 (3.9%) discordant and 1,938 (5.1%) concordant sets (remaining 34,787 [91.0%] sets were sterile). Discordant sets grew 1,060/1,491 (71.1%) contaminants and 431/1,491 (28.9%) true pathogens. Concordant sets grew 222/1,938 (11.4%) contaminants and 1,716/1,938 (88.5%) true pathogens (<i>P</i> < 0.001). Examining coagulase-negative staphylococci (CoNS) only (2019 data set), 629/642 (98.0%) discordant sets grew contaminants, while 13/642 (2.0%) grew true pathogens. In contrast, <i>Staphylococcus aureus</i> grew in only 82/270 (30.4%) discordant sets. Among 858 first CoNS-positive cultures per patient, 624/636 (98.1%) discordant sets grew contaminants, and 12/636 (1.9%) grew CoNS defined as a true pathogen. The negative predictive value of a discordant first CoNS set to exclude true CoNS bacteremia was 98.1% (95% confidence interval 96.7%-98.9%). Examining aerobic vs anaerobic bottles in 356 discordant sets, contaminants were found more frequently in aerobic bottles (135/356, 37.9% vs 73/356, 20.5%, <i>P</i> = 0.04). The proportion of true pathogens was similar in both (79/356, 22.2% vs 69/356, 19.4%, <i>P =</i> 0.4). Discordant CoNS-positive cultures were strongly associated with contamination. This could assist in interpreting blood culture results and supporting antimicrobial stewardship. Discordance might result from a diversion effect, the aerobic bottle acting as a diversion device for the anaerobic bottle.IMPORTANCERapidly distinguishing blood culture contaminants from true pathogens is essential for optimizing antimicrobial stewardship and avoiding unnecessary antibiotic therapy. In this large, two-period study, we demonstrate that discordant growth of coagulase-negative staphylococci in a two-bottle set has a negative predictive value of 98.1% for true bacteremia. This finding remained robust across both study years and when restricted to first positive cultures, highlighting its reliability. Incorporating simple growth pattern analysis into early blood culture interpretation can provide clinicians with reliable and timely information within 24 hours, supporting more targeted and judicious antibiotic use.

Journal of Clinical MicrobiologyVol. 64(2)
Shaare Zedek Medical Center (IL)
Openalex Percentile: Top 75%
Bacterial Identification and Susceptibility Testing
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.