A systematic review of AI for predicting glaucoma progression: challenges and recommendations towards clinical implementation

Glaucoma is the leading cause of irreversible blindness worldwide with heterogeneous progression rates. Artificial Intelligence (AI) may enable accurate progression predictions in clinical practice. We conducted a systematic review to survey quantitative AI performance and examine strengths and shortfalls in current AI approaches with future clinical implementation in mind. Two reviewers independently screened studies in English from MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science, Cochrane CENTRAL and arXiv since 2014 and performed risk of bias assessment on eligible studies using QUADAS-2. 46 reports of 43 unique studies demonstrated moderate to good performance in predicting glaucoma conversion, biological deterioration and progression to surgery. Several challenges for clinical translation remain, including inconsistent reporting, limitations and heterogeneity in study design and poor AI generalisability and transparency. We encourage future studies to adopt robust study design and transparent reporting and propose the first glaucoma-specific list of recommended practices and reporting items for future clinical implementation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
npj Digital Medicine
Published
2026-01-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41746-025-02321-7
Primary Topic
Retinal Imaging and Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A systematic review of AI for predicting glaucoma progression: challenges and recommendations towards clinical implementation

G. Liew, Armando Teixeira‐Pinto, Leo Fan, Yichuan G. Liang et al.
npj Digital Medicine
Retinal Imaging and Analysis
article

A systematic review of AI for predicting glaucoma progression: challenges and recommendations towards clinical implementation

G. Liew, Armando Teixeira‐Pinto, Leo Fan, Yichuan G. Liang, Andrew J. R. White
article en

Abstract

Glaucoma is the leading cause of irreversible blindness worldwide with heterogeneous progression rates. Artificial Intelligence (AI) may enable accurate progression predictions in clinical practice. We conducted a systematic review to survey quantitative AI performance and examine strengths and shortfalls in current AI approaches with future clinical implementation in mind. Two reviewers independently screened studies in English from MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science, Cochrane CENTRAL and arXiv since 2014 and performed risk of bias assessment on eligible studies using QUADAS-2. 46 reports of 43 unique studies demonstrated moderate to good performance in predicting glaucoma conversion, biological deterioration and progression to surgery. Several challenges for clinical translation remain, including inconsistent reporting, limitations and heterogeneity in study design and poor AI generalisability and transparency. We encourage future studies to adopt robust study design and transparent reporting and propose the first glaucoma-specific list of recommended practices and reporting items for future clinical implementation.

npj Digital MedicineVol. 9(1)
The University of Sydney (AU), Children's Hospital at Westmead (AU), Westmead Hospital (AU), Sydney Local Health District (AU), Westmead Institute for Medical Research (AU)
Glaucoma Australia
Openalex Percentile: Top 82%
Retinal Imaging and Analysis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

A systematic review of AI for predicting glaucoma progression: challenges and recommendations towards clinical implementation — G. Liew, Armando Teixeira‐Pinto, et al. · npj Digital Medicine (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS