The Effect of Comprehensive and Integrative Medical Services on Patients with Degenerative Lumbar Spinal Stenosis: A Randomized Controlled Study

<i>Background and Objectives</i>: Degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis (DLSS) frequently manifests as lower leg radiating pain (LLRP), requiring selective nerve root block (SNRB). Comprehensive and Integrative Medical Services (CIMS)-a multimodal program consisting of acupuncture, cupping, and manual therapy-have been increasingly incorporated into clinical practice in Korea. However, randomized evidence remains limited. This study evaluated the efficacy and safety of adjunctive CIMS in patients with DLSS presenting neuropathic LLRP requiring SNRB. <i>Materials and Methods</i>: In a single-center, parallel-group, assessor-blinded randomized controlled trial (CRIS KCT0006036), adults with DLSS (LANSS > 7; VAS > 5) were randomized 1:1 to experimental or control groups (<i>n</i> = 77; experimental 38, control 39). All participants received SNRB plus pharmacotherapy (limaprost, pregabalin). The experimental group additionally received CIMS, delivered eight times over 4 weeks. The primary outcome was pain intensity (VAS) at baseline and weeks 4, 8, and 12. Secondary outcomes included SF-36, ODI, and RMDQ at baseline and weeks 4, 8, and 12. Repeated-measures two-factor ANOVA assessed the main effects and time × group interaction. <i>Results</i>: Mean VAS (experimental vs. control) was 4.73 ± 1.67 vs. 4.70 ± 1.95 at baseline; 3.74 ± 1.68 vs. 4.66 ± 1.60 at week 4; 3.93 ± 2.03 vs. 4.79 ± 1.55 at week 8; and 3.98 ± 1.98 vs. 4.98 ± 1.68 at week 12. The significant time × group interaction was identified (<i>p</i> = 0.040), indicating a greater pain reduction with CIMS. No significant time × group interactions were observed across SF-36 domains. Adherence to CIMS modalities was high, and no unexpected adverse events occurred. <i>Conclusions</i>: In DLSS patients receiving SNRB and pharmacotherapy, adjunctive CIMS resulted in greater pain reduction over 12 weeks compared with standard care alone, without introducing new safety concerns. These findings support the clinical utility of CIMS as an effective adjunctive treatment option for DLSS.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Medicina
Published
2026-01-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina62010225
Primary Topic
Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Effect of Comprehensive and Integrative Medical Services on Patients with Degenerative Lumbar Spinal Stenosis: A Randomized Controlled Study

Hee Chan Kim, Sang Bong Ko, Sang Gyu Kwak
Medicina
Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology
article

The Effect of Comprehensive and Integrative Medical Services on Patients with Degenerative Lumbar Spinal Stenosis: A Randomized Controlled Study

Hee Chan Kim, Sang Bong Ko, Sang Gyu Kwak
article en

Abstract

<i>Background and Objectives</i>: Degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis (DLSS) frequently manifests as lower leg radiating pain (LLRP), requiring selective nerve root block (SNRB). Comprehensive and Integrative Medical Services (CIMS)-a multimodal program consisting of acupuncture, cupping, and manual therapy-have been increasingly incorporated into clinical practice in Korea. However, randomized evidence remains limited. This study evaluated the efficacy and safety of adjunctive CIMS in patients with DLSS presenting neuropathic LLRP requiring SNRB. <i>Materials and Methods</i>: In a single-center, parallel-group, assessor-blinded randomized controlled trial (CRIS KCT0006036), adults with DLSS (LANSS > 7; VAS > 5) were randomized 1:1 to experimental or control groups (<i>n</i> = 77; experimental 38, control 39). All participants received SNRB plus pharmacotherapy (limaprost, pregabalin). The experimental group additionally received CIMS, delivered eight times over 4 weeks. The primary outcome was pain intensity (VAS) at baseline and weeks 4, 8, and 12. Secondary outcomes included SF-36, ODI, and RMDQ at baseline and weeks 4, 8, and 12. Repeated-measures two-factor ANOVA assessed the main effects and time × group interaction. <i>Results</i>: Mean VAS (experimental vs. control) was 4.73 ± 1.67 vs. 4.70 ± 1.95 at baseline; 3.74 ± 1.68 vs. 4.66 ± 1.60 at week 4; 3.93 ± 2.03 vs. 4.79 ± 1.55 at week 8; and 3.98 ± 1.98 vs. 4.98 ± 1.68 at week 12. The significant time × group interaction was identified (<i>p</i> = 0.040), indicating a greater pain reduction with CIMS. No significant time × group interactions were observed across SF-36 domains. Adherence to CIMS modalities was high, and no unexpected adverse events occurred. <i>Conclusions</i>: In DLSS patients receiving SNRB and pharmacotherapy, adjunctive CIMS resulted in greater pain reduction over 12 weeks compared with standard care alone, without introducing new safety concerns. These findings support the clinical utility of CIMS as an effective adjunctive treatment option for DLSS.

MedicinaVol. 62(1)
Daegu Catholic University (KR), Armed Forces Capital Hospital (KR)
Korea Health Industry Development Institute
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 81%
Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.