The Need for an Interpersonal and Institutional Ethic of Care when Working Alongside Lived Experience Researchers: “For me there’s no <i>lived</i> , it’s always <i>living</i> ”

Lived experience (LE) researchers are often lay people who work alongside academics to undertake research within their own communities, particularly in the fields of health and social inquiry. High-quality and rigorous LE research can lead to local, national and international policy and practice impacts; however, if managed poorly, the involvement of LE researchers has the potential to be extractive, inequitable and disempowering. There is a need to understand how universities can support more sustainable and enduring forms of co-investigation with LE researchers. This qualitative research study utilised a phenomenological approach and reflexive thematic analysis in order to understand the lived experiences of LE researchers. Sixteen former and current LE researchers who worked with researchers from an Australian university participated in face-to-face and online semi-structured interviews between May to July 2024. We identified six key themes: (1) LE researchers are motivated to create change; (2) LE research can be both rewarding and taxing; (3) trust must be earned, nurtured and reciprocated; (4) power sharing is less important than responsible leadership; (5) LE research is a methodology NOT a ‘fashion’; and (6) an institutional ethic of care is critical. A social ecological model is used to discuss the implications of the findings at an intrapersonal, interpersonal, institutional and policy level. Given participation has become the new zeitgeist and involvement of people with LE in research is fast becoming a prerequisite for some funding streams, it is important to intentionally establish foundational building blocks supporting the ethical and equitable participation of LE researchers across the social ecological model.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Qualitative Methods
Published
2026-01-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/16094069261417902
Primary Topic
Mental Health and Patient Involvement
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Need for an Interpersonal and Institutional Ethic of Care when Working Alongside Lived Experience Researchers: “For me there’s no lived , it’s always living ”

Cathy Vaughan, Charlene Hue-Ming Edwards, Karen Block
International Journal of Qualitative Methods
Mental Health and Patient Involvement
article

The Need for an Interpersonal and Institutional Ethic of Care when Working Alongside Lived Experience Researchers: “For me there’s no lived , it’s always living ”

Cathy Vaughan, Charlene Hue-Ming Edwards, Karen Block
article en

Abstract

Lived experience (LE) researchers are often lay people who work alongside academics to undertake research within their own communities, particularly in the fields of health and social inquiry. High-quality and rigorous LE research can lead to local, national and international policy and practice impacts; however, if managed poorly, the involvement of LE researchers has the potential to be extractive, inequitable and disempowering. There is a need to understand how universities can support more sustainable and enduring forms of co-investigation with LE researchers. This qualitative research study utilised a phenomenological approach and reflexive thematic analysis in order to understand the lived experiences of LE researchers. Sixteen former and current LE researchers who worked with researchers from an Australian university participated in face-to-face and online semi-structured interviews between May to July 2024. We identified six key themes: (1) LE researchers are motivated to create change; (2) LE research can be both rewarding and taxing; (3) trust must be earned, nurtured and reciprocated; (4) power sharing is less important than responsible leadership; (5) LE research is a methodology NOT a ‘fashion’; and (6) an institutional ethic of care is critical. A social ecological model is used to discuss the implications of the findings at an intrapersonal, interpersonal, institutional and policy level. Given participation has become the new zeitgeist and involvement of people with LE in research is fast becoming a prerequisite for some funding streams, it is important to intentionally establish foundational building blocks supporting the ethical and equitable participation of LE researchers across the social ecological model.

International Journal of Qualitative MethodsVol. 25
The University of Melbourne (AU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 83%
Mental Health and Patient Involvement
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

The Need for an Interpersonal and Institutional Ethic of Care when Working Alongside Lived Experience Researchers: “For me there’s no <i>lived</i> , it’s always <i>living</i> ” — Cathy Vaughan, Charlene Hue-Ming Edwards, et al. · International Journal of Qualitative Methods (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS