Taking a Deeper Look at Teacher Responses to Student Mathematical Thinking in Classroom Discourse

This study aimed to investigate the pattern in two mathematics teachers’ responses to student mathematical thinking (SMT) in classroom discourse and how their responses vary depending on the mathematical potential of the SMT for learning opportunities. The results revealed that in these two cases, teachers mainly directed their responses to whole class or same student. The teachers’ dominant action was literal, demonstrating that teachers primarily provided the students with a chance to offer brief information on mathematical ideas. Most teacher responses were explicit and core, which revealed that teachers paid attention to incorporating main ideas in SMT. The results also showed that the teachers’ preferred actions may change depending on the actor and whether the instances are mathematically significant pedagogical opportunities to build on student thinking (MOST or non-MOST). The lack of responses to the MOSTs demonstrated the limitations in teachers’ ability to present appropriate learning opportunities by using SMT.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Elementary School Journal
Published
2026-01-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1086/739100
Primary Topic
Mathematics Education and Teaching Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Taking a Deeper Look at Teacher Responses to Student Mathematical Thinking in Classroom Discourse

Pınar Güner, Figen Bozkuş
The Elementary School Journal
Mathematics Education and Teaching Techniques
article

Taking a Deeper Look at Teacher Responses to Student Mathematical Thinking in Classroom Discourse

Pınar Güner, Figen Bozkuş
article en

Abstract

This study aimed to investigate the pattern in two mathematics teachers’ responses to student mathematical thinking (SMT) in classroom discourse and how their responses vary depending on the mathematical potential of the SMT for learning opportunities. The results revealed that in these two cases, teachers mainly directed their responses to whole class or same student. The teachers’ dominant action was literal, demonstrating that teachers primarily provided the students with a chance to offer brief information on mathematical ideas. Most teacher responses were explicit and core, which revealed that teachers paid attention to incorporating main ideas in SMT. The results also showed that the teachers’ preferred actions may change depending on the actor and whether the instances are mathematically significant pedagogical opportunities to build on student thinking (MOST or non-MOST). The lack of responses to the MOSTs demonstrated the limitations in teachers’ ability to present appropriate learning opportunities by using SMT.

The Elementary School JournalVol. 126(3)
Istanbul Medipol University (TR), Istanbul University-Cerrahpaşa (TR)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 83%
Mathematics Education and Teaching Techniques
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.