Assessing a virtual scenario-based training system for enhancing clinical reasoning and communication in dental education

Abstract Background This study aims to assess the effectiveness of a virtual scenario-based clinical reasoning training system to improve clinical reasoning and communication skills among dental students. Methods Seventy fourth year dental students, who had previously completed dental basic science courses and theoretical components of clinical dentistry courses, engaged in a four-week clinical communication and reasoning training programme using the virtual scenario-based clinical reasoning training system. All students underwent a communication skills and clinical reasoning assessment before and after using this virtual training system, and their scores, including each module and total scores, were compared using Paired t tests or Wilcoxon signed-rank tests. The level of significance was P < 0.05. Students were asked to provide feedback through a survey to identify the usability and their perceived benefits or drawbacks of this system. Results After using the virtual scenario-based clinical reasoning training system four times with different cases, students’ scores in all modules (history-taking, examination, diagnosis, and treatment) and total scores improved significantly (P < 0.05). Post-training clinical reasoning competence scores (86.13 ± 1.79) were significantly higher than pre-training scores (74.66 ± 2.18), and communication skills also showed significant enhancement (P < 0.05). The average System Usability Scale (SUS) score was 70.14 ± 4.96, indicating above-average system usability. Most students were satisfied with the system (92.86%), acknowledged its advantages of innovative and interesting lectures and effectiveness in improving clinical reasoning (71.43%) and communication skills (67.14%). Conclusion The application of the virtual scenario-based clinical reasoning training system in clinical communication and reasoning training programme can improve students’ clinical reasoning and communication skills.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BMC Oral Health
Published
2026-01-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-026-07723-x
Primary Topic
Clinical Reasoning and Diagnostic Skills
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Assessing a virtual scenario-based training system for enhancing clinical reasoning and communication in dental education

Siyang Yuan, Bin Yan, Luwei Liu, Yanghe Pan et al.
BMC Oral Health
Clinical Reasoning and Diagnostic Skills
article

Assessing a virtual scenario-based training system for enhancing clinical reasoning and communication in dental education

Siyang Yuan, Bin Yan, Luwei Liu, Yanghe Pan, Ye Cao, Zhendong Wang, Zixin Yan, Zhaolan Guan
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background This study aims to assess the effectiveness of a virtual scenario-based clinical reasoning training system to improve clinical reasoning and communication skills among dental students. Methods Seventy fourth year dental students, who had previously completed dental basic science courses and theoretical components of clinical dentistry courses, engaged in a four-week clinical communication and reasoning training programme using the virtual scenario-based clinical reasoning training system. All students underwent a communication skills and clinical reasoning assessment before and after using this virtual training system, and their scores, including each module and total scores, were compared using Paired t tests or Wilcoxon signed-rank tests. The level of significance was P < 0.05. Students were asked to provide feedback through a survey to identify the usability and their perceived benefits or drawbacks of this system. Results After using the virtual scenario-based clinical reasoning training system four times with different cases, students’ scores in all modules (history-taking, examination, diagnosis, and treatment) and total scores improved significantly (P < 0.05). Post-training clinical reasoning competence scores (86.13 ± 1.79) were significantly higher than pre-training scores (74.66 ± 2.18), and communication skills also showed significant enhancement (P < 0.05). The average System Usability Scale (SUS) score was 70.14 ± 4.96, indicating above-average system usability. Most students were satisfied with the system (92.86%), acknowledged its advantages of innovative and interesting lectures and effectiveness in improving clinical reasoning (71.43%) and communication skills (67.14%). Conclusion The application of the virtual scenario-based clinical reasoning training system in clinical communication and reasoning training programme can improve students’ clinical reasoning and communication skills.

BMC Oral HealthVol. 26(1)
University of Dundee (GB), Nanjing Medical University (CN), Nanjing University (CN)
Government of Jiangsu Province, Nanjing Medical University, Division of Graduate Education
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 81%
Clinical Reasoning and Diagnostic Skills
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.