Recovery Vistas in Mental Health and Addiction

Abstract Recovery is a widely used and generally favorable term within mental health services, denoting positive and progressive developments in care and outcomes. Despite extensive research on recovery in the fields of serious mental health challenges and addiction, there remains no consensus regarding its conceptualization. In this article, we provide a historical account of the recovery concept as applied to mental health and addiction, followed by a discussion of recent research and conceptual developments. Recovery encompasses both the reduction of pathology and the enhancement of overall functioning and well-being. Accordingly, ethical considerations are pivotal, as the study of recovery inherently involves value judgments regarding what constitutes ‘good’ or ‘poor’ outcomes. Given the complexity of the concept, we propose the integration of different recovery paradigms—including clinical, personal, social, relational, and natural recovery. We examine the need to reconcile researcher-derived criteria with the perspectives of individuals who have lived experience of recovery. This discussion is framed in relation to the provision of evidence-based treatment, the delivery of tailored and individualized care, and the implementation of scientific findings in clinical practice.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Psychosocial Rehabilitation and Mental Health
Published
2026-01-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s40737-025-00515-6
Primary Topic
Mental Health and Patient Involvement
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Recovery Vistas in Mental Health and Addiction

Ottar Ness, Fredrik D. Moe
Journal of Psychosocial Rehabilitation and Mental Health
Mental Health and Patient Involvement
article

Recovery Vistas in Mental Health and Addiction

Ottar Ness, Fredrik D. Moe
article en

Abstract

Abstract Recovery is a widely used and generally favorable term within mental health services, denoting positive and progressive developments in care and outcomes. Despite extensive research on recovery in the fields of serious mental health challenges and addiction, there remains no consensus regarding its conceptualization. In this article, we provide a historical account of the recovery concept as applied to mental health and addiction, followed by a discussion of recent research and conceptual developments. Recovery encompasses both the reduction of pathology and the enhancement of overall functioning and well-being. Accordingly, ethical considerations are pivotal, as the study of recovery inherently involves value judgments regarding what constitutes ‘good’ or ‘poor’ outcomes. Given the complexity of the concept, we propose the integration of different recovery paradigms—including clinical, personal, social, relational, and natural recovery. We examine the need to reconcile researcher-derived criteria with the perspectives of individuals who have lived experience of recovery. This discussion is framed in relation to the provision of evidence-based treatment, the delivery of tailored and individualized care, and the implementation of scientific findings in clinical practice.

Journal of Psychosocial Rehabilitation and Mental Health
Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NO), University of Bergen (NO)
No poverty
Openalex Percentile: Top 83%
Mental Health and Patient Involvement
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.