The 30-Minute Interview Methods Guide: Lessons From Over 100 Interviews in the Health Policy Domain

Over the past five years, accelerated by the COVID-19 pandemic, qualitative research has evolved, with a shift to online settings and rapid analysis techniques, enhancing access and streamlining research processes. When recruiting health policy professionals and digital public health stakeholders with time constraints for qualitative studies, we encountered a challenge that remains underexplored in the literature: how to conduct interviews under 30 min while ensuring high data quality, depth and maintaining research rigour. Drawing on over 100 short interviews undertaken across four studies in health policy and digital public health, we provide experience-based guidance on addressing this challenge. We outline key methodological adaptations required to (1) secure participation from time-constrained professionals and (2) obtain meaningful insights despite limited time. These range from strategies adopted prior to the interview - such as sampling approach, preparation of materials, and interviewer training - to in-interview adaptations, including time management techniques and choices regarding recording and note-taking, all aimed at optimising the use of limited interview time. Our experience contributes to the advancement of qualitative research methods by reporting that, through extensive pilot testing and a carefully designed interview guide, 30-min short interviews can generate valuable data while accommodating professionals’ schedules and maintaining research rigour. This approach expands the reach of qualitative research, enabling data collection from individuals otherwise inaccessible due to time constraints.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Qualitative Methods
Published
2026-01-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/16094069251414255
Primary Topic
Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The 30-Minute Interview Methods Guide: Lessons From Over 100 Interviews in the Health Policy Domain

Federica Zavattaro, Felix Gille
International Journal of Qualitative Methods
Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods
article

The 30-Minute Interview Methods Guide: Lessons From Over 100 Interviews in the Health Policy Domain

Federica Zavattaro, Felix Gille
article en

Abstract

Over the past five years, accelerated by the COVID-19 pandemic, qualitative research has evolved, with a shift to online settings and rapid analysis techniques, enhancing access and streamlining research processes. When recruiting health policy professionals and digital public health stakeholders with time constraints for qualitative studies, we encountered a challenge that remains underexplored in the literature: how to conduct interviews under 30 min while ensuring high data quality, depth and maintaining research rigour. Drawing on over 100 short interviews undertaken across four studies in health policy and digital public health, we provide experience-based guidance on addressing this challenge. We outline key methodological adaptations required to (1) secure participation from time-constrained professionals and (2) obtain meaningful insights despite limited time. These range from strategies adopted prior to the interview - such as sampling approach, preparation of materials, and interviewer training - to in-interview adaptations, including time management techniques and choices regarding recording and note-taking, all aimed at optimising the use of limited interview time. Our experience contributes to the advancement of qualitative research methods by reporting that, through extensive pilot testing and a carefully designed interview guide, 30-min short interviews can generate valuable data while accommodating professionals’ schedules and maintaining research rigour. This approach expands the reach of qualitative research, enabling data collection from individuals otherwise inaccessible due to time constraints.

International Journal of Qualitative MethodsVol. 25
University of Zurich (CH)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 84%
Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.