Identifying as Autistic Without a Formal Diagnosis: Who Self-Identifies as Autistic and Why?

Background: Adults increasingly self-identify as autistic without a formal diagnosis, yet little research has systematically investigated (a) the unique characteristics, experiences, and needs of self-identifying adults and (b) their preferences regarding diagnosis. Understanding the unique needs and preferences of self-identifying adults is necessary to better support them. Method: We conducted a cross-sectional, mixed-methods study of U.S. autistic adults who either self-identified as autistic ( n = 147) or had a formal autism diagnosis ( n = 115), recruited via the survey platform Prolific. Participants were compared on (a) demographic characteristics, (b) autistic traits and experiences, (c) psychosocial outcomes, (d) support needs, and (e) beliefs about autism. Moreover, self-identifying participants reported whether they wanted a diagnosis, why or why not, and what barriers they faced. Results: Self-identifying autistic adults were similar to diagnosed adults in autistic traits, including diagnostic traits (>93% of both groups scored ≥14 on the Ritvo Autism and Asperger Diagnostic Scale-14 Screen). However, self-identifying autistic adults differed from diagnosed adults in significant ways. Self-identifying adults were more likely to be cisgender female (53.5% vs. 27.0%), experienced worse mental well-being ( d s = −0.41), were more likely to experience unmet support needs (71.4% vs. 47.0%), and faced unique barriers to receiving support (most frequently a lack of resources). The majority (68.7%) of self-identifying adults wanted a formal diagnosis but faced barriers in doing so. Self-identifying adults named a number of reasons for wanting a diagnosis (e.g., validation, access to certain services), but also grounds for hesitation (e.g., fear of stigma and discrimination). Conclusion: Adults who self-identify as autistic are similar to diagnosed adults in their autistic traits but face more barriers to accessing services and may be uniquely vulnerable to experiencing adverse psychosocial outcomes. Psychosocial outcomes in self-identifying autistic adults may be improved by increasing access to diagnosis and/or psychosocial services.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Autism in Adulthood
Published
2026-01-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/25739581251409920
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Autism Spectrum Disorder Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
59.42
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Identifying as Autistic Without a Formal Diagnosis: Who Self-Identifies as Autistic and Why?

Emine Gürbüz, Isaac Ahuvia, Jacquelyn A Gates, Josephine Cuda et al.
2 citations
Autism in Adulthood
Autism Spectrum Disorder Research
59.42
article

Identifying as Autistic Without a Formal Diagnosis: Who Self-Identifies as Autistic and Why?

Emine Gürbüz, Isaac Ahuvia, Jacquelyn A Gates, Josephine Cuda, Ava N. Gurba, Steven K. Kapp, Abigail Houck, Jessica L. Schleider
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Background: Adults increasingly self-identify as autistic without a formal diagnosis, yet little research has systematically investigated (a) the unique characteristics, experiences, and needs of self-identifying adults and (b) their preferences regarding diagnosis. Understanding the unique needs and preferences of self-identifying adults is necessary to better support them. Method: We conducted a cross-sectional, mixed-methods study of U.S. autistic adults who either self-identified as autistic ( n = 147) or had a formal autism diagnosis ( n = 115), recruited via the survey platform Prolific. Participants were compared on (a) demographic characteristics, (b) autistic traits and experiences, (c) psychosocial outcomes, (d) support needs, and (e) beliefs about autism. Moreover, self-identifying participants reported whether they wanted a diagnosis, why or why not, and what barriers they faced. Results: Self-identifying autistic adults were similar to diagnosed adults in autistic traits, including diagnostic traits (>93% of both groups scored ≥14 on the Ritvo Autism and Asperger Diagnostic Scale-14 Screen). However, self-identifying autistic adults differed from diagnosed adults in significant ways. Self-identifying adults were more likely to be cisgender female (53.5% vs. 27.0%), experienced worse mental well-being ( d s = −0.41), were more likely to experience unmet support needs (71.4% vs. 47.0%), and faced unique barriers to receiving support (most frequently a lack of resources). The majority (68.7%) of self-identifying adults wanted a formal diagnosis but faced barriers in doing so. Self-identifying adults named a number of reasons for wanting a diagnosis (e.g., validation, access to certain services), but also grounds for hesitation (e.g., fear of stigma and discrimination). Conclusion: Adults who self-identify as autistic are similar to diagnosed adults in their autistic traits but face more barriers to accessing services and may be uniquely vulnerable to experiencing adverse psychosocial outcomes. Psychosocial outcomes in self-identifying autistic adults may be improved by increasing access to diagnosis and/or psychosocial services.

Autism in Adulthood
Northwestern University (US), Curry College (US), Stony Brook University (US), University of Portsmouth (GB), Drexel University (US), University of Arkansas at Fayetteville (US)
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 0%
Autism Spectrum Disorder Research
59.42
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.