Hard–Soft Acid–Base Interactions Control Ionic Conductivity in Molecular-Crystal-Based Electrolytes

The influence of hard and soft base coordination on ionic conductivity was systematically investigated using diamine (hard base)- and dinitrile (soft base)-based ligands in molecular crystal-based solid electrolytes. For molecular crystals (Gln)2LiPF6, (Gln)2CuPF6, (DAB)2LiPF6, and (DAB)2CuPF6 (Gln = glutaronitrile, DAB = 1,4-diaminobutane) with isomorphic crystal structures (P4̅21c space group) and comparable metal–metal (Li+–Li+ or Cu+–Cu+) distances, less favorable soft–hard interactions (Cu+–amine or Li+–nitrile) resulted in nearly 2 orders of magnitude improvement in ionic conductivity compared to the more favorable soft–soft and hard–hard pairings (Cu+–nitrile or Li+–amine). This significant enhancement is attributed to the weaker, more labile coordination between soft nitrile donors and hard Li+ ions or hard -NH2 donors and soft Cu+, facilitating faster ion migration, reinforcing the critical role of Hard–Soft Acid–Base theory (HSAB)-guided coordination chemistry in modulating ion mobility in soft-solid molecular electrolytes, and providing valuable insights to rationally design high-performance solid electrolytes.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
ACS Materials Letters
Published
2026-01-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1021/acsmaterialslett.5c01234
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Advanced Battery Materials and Technologies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
21.93
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Hard–Soft Acid–Base Interactions Control Ionic Conductivity in Molecular-Crystal-Based Electrolytes

Stephanie L. Wunder, Michael J. Zdilla, Shujit Chandra Paul
1 citations
ACS Materials Letters
Advanced Battery Materials and Technologies
21.93
article

Hard–Soft Acid–Base Interactions Control Ionic Conductivity in Molecular-Crystal-Based Electrolytes

Stephanie L. Wunder, Michael J. Zdilla, Shujit Chandra Paul
article en
1 citations

Abstract

The influence of hard and soft base coordination on ionic conductivity was systematically investigated using diamine (hard base)- and dinitrile (soft base)-based ligands in molecular crystal-based solid electrolytes. For molecular crystals (Gln)2LiPF6, (Gln)2CuPF6, (DAB)2LiPF6, and (DAB)2CuPF6 (Gln = glutaronitrile, DAB = 1,4-diaminobutane) with isomorphic crystal structures (P4̅21c space group) and comparable metal–metal (Li+–Li+ or Cu+–Cu+) distances, less favorable soft–hard interactions (Cu+–amine or Li+–nitrile) resulted in nearly 2 orders of magnitude improvement in ionic conductivity compared to the more favorable soft–soft and hard–hard pairings (Cu+–nitrile or Li+–amine). This significant enhancement is attributed to the weaker, more labile coordination between soft nitrile donors and hard Li+ ions or hard -NH2 donors and soft Cu+, facilitating faster ion migration, reinforcing the critical role of Hard–Soft Acid–Base theory (HSAB)-guided coordination chemistry in modulating ion mobility in soft-solid molecular electrolytes, and providing valuable insights to rationally design high-performance solid electrolytes.

ACS Materials LettersVol. 8(2)
Temple College (US), Temple University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Advanced Battery Materials and Technologies
21.93
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.