Exploring Systems Thinking and System Dynamics in Fire Safety Engineering: A Literature Review

The increasing complexity in the Fire Safety Engineering (FSE) field requires the adoption of risk assessment and safety management methods which address such complex behavior. In this context, complexity refers to systems of multiple interacting components where non-linear and adaptive relationships generate emergent behaviors, i.e., outcomes that cannot be anticipated solely by examining the individual parts. Systems Thinking (ST), including tools such as System Archetypes, Causal Loop Diagrams, and System Dynamics (SD) modeling, offers a holistic framework to address these challenges. This article presents a literature review on the application of ST and SD in FSE, focusing on its use in enhancing fire safety for buildings and infrastructures by identifying key trends, methodologies, challenges, and future research directions. A six-stage framework is adopted for the literature review which examines the development of ST in FSE. In total 35 studies were found as relevant for the FSE field due to their application of at least one ST tool. However, challenges such as the complexity of modeling large-scale systems, the need for high-quality data, and the integration of SD with other fire safety engineering methods remain. Overall, this review underscores the value of ST as a powerful tool for addressing the complexities of FSE, testing the effectiveness of different safety measures, and improving risk assessment in various environments, while highlighting that its potential usage has not been fully developed yet.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Fire Technology
Published
2026-01-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10694-025-01856-1
Primary Topic
Occupational Health and Safety Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Exploring Systems Thinking and System Dynamics in Fire Safety Engineering: A Literature Review

Ruben Van Coile, Julio Ariel Dueñas Santana, E. Salzano, Almerinda Di Benedetto
Fire Technology
Occupational Health and Safety Research
article

Exploring Systems Thinking and System Dynamics in Fire Safety Engineering: A Literature Review

Ruben Van Coile, Julio Ariel Dueñas Santana, E. Salzano, Almerinda Di Benedetto
article en

Abstract

The increasing complexity in the Fire Safety Engineering (FSE) field requires the adoption of risk assessment and safety management methods which address such complex behavior. In this context, complexity refers to systems of multiple interacting components where non-linear and adaptive relationships generate emergent behaviors, i.e., outcomes that cannot be anticipated solely by examining the individual parts. Systems Thinking (ST), including tools such as System Archetypes, Causal Loop Diagrams, and System Dynamics (SD) modeling, offers a holistic framework to address these challenges. This article presents a literature review on the application of ST and SD in FSE, focusing on its use in enhancing fire safety for buildings and infrastructures by identifying key trends, methodologies, challenges, and future research directions. A six-stage framework is adopted for the literature review which examines the development of ST in FSE. In total 35 studies were found as relevant for the FSE field due to their application of at least one ST tool. However, challenges such as the complexity of modeling large-scale systems, the need for high-quality data, and the integration of SD with other fire safety engineering methods remain. Overall, this review underscores the value of ST as a powerful tool for addressing the complexities of FSE, testing the effectiveness of different safety measures, and improving risk assessment in various environments, while highlighting that its potential usage has not been fully developed yet.

Fire TechnologyVol. 62(2)
HOGENT University of Applied Sciences and Arts (BE), VSB - Technical University of Ostrava (CZ), Ghent University (BE), Scuola Superiore Meridionale (IT), University of Naples Federico II (IT), University of Bologna (IT)
Università degli Studi di Napoli Federico II, European Commission, HORIZON EUROPE Framework Programme
Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 83%
Occupational Health and Safety Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.