Supporting Staff To Address the Physical Health of Consumers in Mental Healthcare Settings: A Modified Nominal Group Technique

Mental health consumers experience challenges in accessing regular physical healthcare. Staff working in mental health settings are well-positioned to address the issue; however, they often face significant barriers in delivering physical healthcare. The primary aim of this study was to identify important factors that support mental health staff to address the physical health of consumers; the secondary aim was to evaluate the utility of using a modified nominal group technique (NGT). Four main methodological modifications to standard NGT methods were made: (i) theoretical models (COM-B and Theoretical Domains Framework) were used to frame the NGT process, (ii) idea generation and ranking steps were conducted outside NGT sessions, (iii) both in-person and online groups were offered, and (iv) participants contributed to interpretation and dissemination of the findings. Individuals with expertise in the mental health sector participated in one of two NGT sessions, either in-person (n=13) or online (n=8). Considering Australian public mental health services, participants responded to the question: "What is needed for staff to optimally address physical health within their role?". Additionally, participant experiences and acceptability of this modified NGT process were evaluated through follow-up interviews (n=6). A total of 55 concepts were generated within COM-B components: capability (n=18), opportunity (n=26), and motivation (n=11). Highest-ranking key concepts were awareness (capability), leadership support (opportunity), and beliefs (motivation). Qualitative data indicated that the modified NGT method was effective, particularly when using a framework to guide ideas generation; however, the additional time commitment may reduce feasibility.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Community Mental Health Journal
Published
2026-01-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10597-025-01589-z
Primary Topic
Delphi Technique in Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Supporting Staff To Address the Physical Health of Consumers in Mental Healthcare Settings: A Modified Nominal Group Technique

Sally Plever, Justin Chapman, Oscar Lederman, Andrew Watkins et al.
Community Mental Health Journal
Delphi Technique in Research
article

Supporting Staff To Address the Physical Health of Consumers in Mental Healthcare Settings: A Modified Nominal Group Technique

Sally Plever, Justin Chapman, Oscar Lederman, Andrew Watkins, Grace McKeon, D. J. G. Johnston, Victoria Stewart, Geoffrey Lau, Russell Roberts, Sam Manger, Nicole Korman, Amanda Wheeler, Di Hu, Jennie Somerville, Philip Ward, Mary Lou Chatterton, Shuichi Suetani, Scott Teasdale, Amanda L Rebar, Simon Rosenbaum, Irene McCarthy, Puspa Sherlock, Paul G Klotz
article en

Abstract

Mental health consumers experience challenges in accessing regular physical healthcare. Staff working in mental health settings are well-positioned to address the issue; however, they often face significant barriers in delivering physical healthcare. The primary aim of this study was to identify important factors that support mental health staff to address the physical health of consumers; the secondary aim was to evaluate the utility of using a modified nominal group technique (NGT). Four main methodological modifications to standard NGT methods were made: (i) theoretical models (COM-B and Theoretical Domains Framework) were used to frame the NGT process, (ii) idea generation and ranking steps were conducted outside NGT sessions, (iii) both in-person and online groups were offered, and (iv) participants contributed to interpretation and dissemination of the findings. Individuals with expertise in the mental health sector participated in one of two NGT sessions, either in-person (n=13) or online (n=8). Considering Australian public mental health services, participants responded to the question: "What is needed for staff to optimally address physical health within their role?". Additionally, participant experiences and acceptability of this modified NGT process were evaluated through follow-up interviews (n=6). A total of 55 concepts were generated within COM-B components: capability (n=18), opportunity (n=26), and motivation (n=11). Highest-ranking key concepts were awareness (capability), leadership support (opportunity), and beliefs (motivation). Qualitative data indicated that the modified NGT method was effective, particularly when using a framework to guide ideas generation; however, the additional time commitment may reduce feasibility.

Community Mental Health Journal
University of Technology Sydney (AU), Griffith University (AU), Charles Sturt University (AU), University of South Carolina (US), The University of Queensland (AU), UNSW Sydney (AU), Metro South Health (AU), Indigenous Wellbeing Centre (AU), Queensland Centre for Mental Health Research (AU), Ingham Institute (AU), Oldham Council (GB), Mindgardens Neuroscience Network, Monash University (AU), Central Queensland University (AU), James Cook University (AU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 84%
Delphi Technique in Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.