Integrated assessment of ventilation strategies for exposure and comfort in a multi-bed negative-pressure isolation room

• Three ventilation strategies compared under matched conditions in a two-bed NPIR. • Exposure and thermal comfort assessed together in a shared negative-pressure ward. • Air curtain strongly reduced cross-contamination but raised draft at higher ACH rates. • Mixing and displacement showed persistent limits in controlling localized exposure. • Comfort metrics (PMV, PPD, DR, ADPI) quantified performance across all strategies. Airborne cross-contamination in multi-bed negative-pressure isolation rooms is difficult to control, because even high ventilation rates cannot fully prevent the short-range airflow patterns that carry exhaled air from one patient to another. This study examines how three common ventilation strategies (mixing, displacement, and air-curtain ventilation) affect patient-to-patient exposure and thermal comfort when tested under the same room layout and boundary conditions with different nominal ventilation rates (12, 18, and 24 ACH). Two separate respiratory sources were analyzed in the patients’ breathing zones, and comfort was assessed using PMV, PPD, draft rate, and ADPI. The air curtain system created a clear airflow barrier between beds and produced the lowest exposure levels, although higher flow rates increased draft and reduced comfort. Mixing ventilation provided the most even temperature and velocity distribution but spread contaminants more widely. Displacement ventilation showed mixed behavior, with lower mixing near the floor but uneven exposure at low ACH. This study addresses a gap in the existing literature by offering the first direct, side-by-side comparison of these ventilation strategies in a multi-bed negative-pressure room under matched conditions, considering exposure and comfort together rather than separately. The results highlight the trade-offs between infection control and comfort and provide practical guidance for selecting ventilation strategies in shared isolation spaces.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Results in Engineering
Published
2026-01-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rineng.2026.109210
Primary Topic
Nosocomial Infections in ICU
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Integrated assessment of ventilation strategies for exposure and comfort in a multi-bed negative-pressure isolation room

Yunus Emre Çetin, Martin Kriegel, Peter Vilhelm Nielsen, Bahadir Erman Yuce
Results in Engineering
Nosocomial Infections in ICU
article

Integrated assessment of ventilation strategies for exposure and comfort in a multi-bed negative-pressure isolation room

Yunus Emre Çetin, Martin Kriegel, Peter Vilhelm Nielsen, Bahadir Erman Yuce
article en

Abstract

• Three ventilation strategies compared under matched conditions in a two-bed NPIR. • Exposure and thermal comfort assessed together in a shared negative-pressure ward. • Air curtain strongly reduced cross-contamination but raised draft at higher ACH rates. • Mixing and displacement showed persistent limits in controlling localized exposure. • Comfort metrics (PMV, PPD, DR, ADPI) quantified performance across all strategies. Airborne cross-contamination in multi-bed negative-pressure isolation rooms is difficult to control, because even high ventilation rates cannot fully prevent the short-range airflow patterns that carry exhaled air from one patient to another. This study examines how three common ventilation strategies (mixing, displacement, and air-curtain ventilation) affect patient-to-patient exposure and thermal comfort when tested under the same room layout and boundary conditions with different nominal ventilation rates (12, 18, and 24 ACH). Two separate respiratory sources were analyzed in the patients’ breathing zones, and comfort was assessed using PMV, PPD, draft rate, and ADPI. The air curtain system created a clear airflow barrier between beds and produced the lowest exposure levels, although higher flow rates increased draft and reduced comfort. Mixing ventilation provided the most even temperature and velocity distribution but spread contaminants more widely. Displacement ventilation showed mixed behavior, with lower mixing near the floor but uneven exposure at low ACH. This study addresses a gap in the existing literature by offering the first direct, side-by-side comparison of these ventilation strategies in a multi-bed negative-pressure room under matched conditions, considering exposure and comfort together rather than separately. The results highlight the trade-offs between infection control and comfort and provide practical guidance for selecting ventilation strategies in shared isolation spaces.

Results in EngineeringVol. 29
Bursa Uludağ Üni̇versi̇tesi̇ (TR), Technische Universität Berlin (DE), Aalborg University (DK)
Openalex Percentile: Top 81%
Nosocomial Infections in ICU
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.