Innovation peer effects and institutional cross-ownership

Purpose We examine whether industry peers influence a firm’s innovation output and whether institutional cross-ownership is an important mechanism behind the peer effect. Design/methodology/approach We address endogeneity using two complementary identification strategies: (1) peer firms’ lagged idiosyncratic equity returns as an instrument for peer innovation and (2) staggered changes in state-level corporate income tax rates as a quasi-natural experiment. Innovation output is measured using patent counts. We estimate negative binomial models and implement a two-step control function approach. Heterogeneity analyses examine the moderating roles of institutional cross-ownership, information uncertainty and industry competition. Findings We find evidence of positive peer effects on innovation output. Effects are stronger when peers share institutional blockholders, when uncertainty is higher and in more competitive industries. Patent citation flows indicate greater knowledge transfer among cross-owned peers. Originality/value We are the first to show that institutional cross-ownership strengthens industry peer effects on innovation output by facilitating information spillovers, offering new evidence on how common owners shape real corporate outcomes.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Managerial Finance
Published
2026-01-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1108/mf-05-2025-0314
Primary Topic
Corporate Finance and Governance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Innovation peer effects and institutional cross-ownership

Grace Qing Hao, Keming Li
Managerial Finance
Corporate Finance and Governance
article

Innovation peer effects and institutional cross-ownership

Grace Qing Hao, Keming Li
article en

Abstract

Purpose We examine whether industry peers influence a firm’s innovation output and whether institutional cross-ownership is an important mechanism behind the peer effect. Design/methodology/approach We address endogeneity using two complementary identification strategies: (1) peer firms’ lagged idiosyncratic equity returns as an instrument for peer innovation and (2) staggered changes in state-level corporate income tax rates as a quasi-natural experiment. Innovation output is measured using patent counts. We estimate negative binomial models and implement a two-step control function approach. Heterogeneity analyses examine the moderating roles of institutional cross-ownership, information uncertainty and industry competition. Findings We find evidence of positive peer effects on innovation output. Effects are stronger when peers share institutional blockholders, when uncertainty is higher and in more competitive industries. Patent citation flows indicate greater knowledge transfer among cross-owned peers. Originality/value We are the first to show that institutional cross-ownership strengthens industry peer effects on innovation output by facilitating information spillovers, offering new evidence on how common owners shape real corporate outcomes.

Managerial Finance
Texas A&M University – San Antonio (US), The University of Texas at Arlington (US), Japan Real Estate Institute (JP)
Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 82%
Corporate Finance and Governance
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.