“The Camera Rolls, Everyone, Shhh!!”: Power Dynamics in a Participatory Video Project With Older Adults

This study contributes to the call for more reflexive accounts of arts-based participatory research by offering an in-depth account of the backstage processes of participatory video (PV) research projects with older adults. Drawing on two projects involving older adults in the context of research on age-friendly cities, we investigate how different film roles influence power dynamics within participatory video research. Using a responsive evaluation approach, we analysed various forms of data, including field notes, notes of group reflections, and focus groups transcripts. Our findings show that flexible film roles on the one hand, such as camera operator, interviewer, editor, or overall member of the film crew, offered diverse and meaningful pathways for engagement. Communicative spaces were fostered by flexibility, playfulness, and relational responsiveness. However, these same roles also introduced new power dynamics. Film roles carry specific associations of skill, talent, ascribed attributes, and authority, enabling co-researchers to negotiate power and to amplify voices in distinct ways, while marginalising and silencing others, within and beyond the group. Where art-based participatory research often (implicitly) claims or suggests to represent “the voices” of the communities involved, power imbalances undermine the legitimacy of such representative claims. This can have far reaching implications when the output of such projects inform public policy, advocacy and quality improvement, and this can contribute to epistemic injustice. We argue that in order to navigate these power dynamics participatory video research requires attentiveness to power, needing situated work and reflection throughout the process.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Qualitative Methods
Published
2026-01-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/16094069251414242
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Participatory Visual Research Methods
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
55.57
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

“The Camera Rolls, Everyone, Shhh!!”: Power Dynamics in a Participatory Video Project With Older Adults

Jeroen Dikken, Zsuzsu K.C.T. Tavy, Anita Ham, Joost van Hoof et al.
1 citations
International Journal of Qualitative Methods
Participatory Visual Research Methods
55.57
article

“The Camera Rolls, Everyone, Shhh!!”: Power Dynamics in a Participatory Video Project With Older Adults

Jeroen Dikken, Zsuzsu K.C.T. Tavy, Anita Ham, Joost van Hoof, Hester M. van de Bovenkamp
article en
1 citations

Abstract

This study contributes to the call for more reflexive accounts of arts-based participatory research by offering an in-depth account of the backstage processes of participatory video (PV) research projects with older adults. Drawing on two projects involving older adults in the context of research on age-friendly cities, we investigate how different film roles influence power dynamics within participatory video research. Using a responsive evaluation approach, we analysed various forms of data, including field notes, notes of group reflections, and focus groups transcripts. Our findings show that flexible film roles on the one hand, such as camera operator, interviewer, editor, or overall member of the film crew, offered diverse and meaningful pathways for engagement. Communicative spaces were fostered by flexibility, playfulness, and relational responsiveness. However, these same roles also introduced new power dynamics. Film roles carry specific associations of skill, talent, ascribed attributes, and authority, enabling co-researchers to negotiate power and to amplify voices in distinct ways, while marginalising and silencing others, within and beyond the group. Where art-based participatory research often (implicitly) claims or suggests to represent “the voices” of the communities involved, power imbalances undermine the legitimacy of such representative claims. This can have far reaching implications when the output of such projects inform public policy, advocacy and quality improvement, and this can contribute to epistemic injustice. We argue that in order to navigate these power dynamics participatory video research requires attentiveness to power, needing situated work and reflection throughout the process.

International Journal of Qualitative MethodsVol. 25
Wrocław University of Environmental and Life Sciences (PL), Erasmus University Rotterdam (NL), The Hague University of Applied Sciences (NL)
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Participatory Visual Research Methods
55.57
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.