Interobserver image registration variability impacts on stereotactic arrhythmia radioablation (STAR) target margins

<i>Background and purpose</i>. To determine the interobserver variability in registrations of cardiac computed tomography (CT) images and to assess the margins needed to account for the observed variability in the context of stereotactic arrhythmia radioablation (STAR).<i>Materials and methods.</i>STAR targets were delineated on cardiac CTs for fifteen consecutive patients. Ten expert observers were asked to rigidly register the cardiac CT images to corresponding planning CT images. Registrations all started with a fully automated registration step, followed by manual adjustments. The targets were transferred from cardiac to planning CT using each of the registrations along with one consensus registration for each patient. The margin needed for the consensus target to encompass each of the observer and fully automated targets was measured.<i>Results.</i>A total of 150 registrations were evaluated for this study. Manual registrations required an average (standard deviation) of 5 min, 55 s (2 min, 10 s) to perform. The automated registration, without manual intervention, required an expansion of 6 mm to achieve 95% overlap for 97% of patients. For the manual registrations, an expansion of 4 mm achieved 95% overlap for 97% of the patients and observers. The remaining 3% required expansions from 4 to 9 mm. An expansion of 3 mm achieved 95% overlap in 88% of the cases. Some patients required larger expansions compared to others and small target volume was common among these more difficult cases. Neither breath-hold nor target position were observed to impact variability among observers. Some of the observers required larger expansions compared to others and those requiring the largest margins were not the same from patient to patient.<i>Conclusion.</i>Registration of cardiac CT to the planning CT contributed approximately 3 mm of uncertainty to the STAR targeting process. Accordingly, workflows in which target delineation is performed on cardiac CT should explicitly account for this uncertainty in the overall target margin assessment.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Biomedical Physics & Engineering Express
Published
2026-01-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1088/2057-1976/ae3b44
Primary Topic
Cardiac Arrhythmias and Treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Interobserver image registration variability impacts on stereotactic arrhythmia radioablation (STAR) target margins

Scott Friesen, H. Cochet, Usha B. Tedrow, Kelly Fitzgerald et al.
Biomedical Physics & Engineering Express
Cardiac Arrhythmias and Treatments
article

Interobserver image registration variability impacts on stereotactic arrhythmia radioablation (STAR) target margins

Scott Friesen, H. Cochet, Usha B. Tedrow, Kelly Fitzgerald, Yue-Houng Hu, Arianna Liles, Kolade M. Agboola, Yida David Hu, Christian V. Guthier, J. Whitaker, Jeremy Scott Bredfeldt, Raymond H Mak, Dianne Ferguson
article en

Abstract

<i>Background and purpose</i>. To determine the interobserver variability in registrations of cardiac computed tomography (CT) images and to assess the margins needed to account for the observed variability in the context of stereotactic arrhythmia radioablation (STAR).<i>Materials and methods.</i>STAR targets were delineated on cardiac CTs for fifteen consecutive patients. Ten expert observers were asked to rigidly register the cardiac CT images to corresponding planning CT images. Registrations all started with a fully automated registration step, followed by manual adjustments. The targets were transferred from cardiac to planning CT using each of the registrations along with one consensus registration for each patient. The margin needed for the consensus target to encompass each of the observer and fully automated targets was measured.<i>Results.</i>A total of 150 registrations were evaluated for this study. Manual registrations required an average (standard deviation) of 5 min, 55 s (2 min, 10 s) to perform. The automated registration, without manual intervention, required an expansion of 6 mm to achieve 95% overlap for 97% of patients. For the manual registrations, an expansion of 4 mm achieved 95% overlap for 97% of the patients and observers. The remaining 3% required expansions from 4 to 9 mm. An expansion of 3 mm achieved 95% overlap in 88% of the cases. Some patients required larger expansions compared to others and small target volume was common among these more difficult cases. Neither breath-hold nor target position were observed to impact variability among observers. Some of the observers required larger expansions compared to others and those requiring the largest margins were not the same from patient to patient.<i>Conclusion.</i>Registration of cardiac CT to the planning CT contributed approximately 3 mm of uncertainty to the STAR targeting process. Accordingly, workflows in which target delineation is performed on cardiac CT should explicitly account for this uncertainty in the overall target margin assessment.

Biomedical Physics & Engineering ExpressVol. 12(1)
Brigham and Women's Hospital (US), Harvard University (US), King's College London (GB), Bordeaux Population Health (FR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 82%
Cardiac Arrhythmias and Treatments
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.