Divergent performance of multiple satellite-based products for monitoring water use efficiency across diverse agroecosystems

Multiple satellite remote sensing-based gross primary productivity (GPP) and evapotranspiration (ET) products have been developed to simulate the spatiotemporal patterns of carbon and water cycles in terrestrial ecosystems. However, the performance of these products in monitoring cropland water use efficiency (WUE) has rarely been evaluated. In this study, a total of 140 site-years of flux data across the maize, soybean, rice and winter wheat ecosystems were used as a benchmark to assess the performance of such products over 8-day, monthly and annual time scales, including the Breathing Earth System Simulator (BESS), Global Land Surface Satellite (GLASS), Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS), and the Penman-Monteith-Leuning V2 (PML), respectively. Our site-level evaluation demonstrated that the performance of such satellite-based products for monitoring WUE varied considerably across diverse agroecosystems. BESS WUE outperformed the other three products at all time scales when mixing all crop types together. However, the optimal product varied for specific crop across 8-day, monthly and yearly scales. At the 8-day scale, BESS performed best in simulating WUE for maize, while PML was superior for the other three crops. It indicated that the models that closely coupled carbon and water cycles tend to yield more robust WUE estimates. At the monthly scale, the BESS again provided the most accurate WUE for maize and soybean, whereas the PML product performed best for rice and winter wheat. Nevertheless, all products showed limitations, particularly in capturing the interannual variations of cropland WUE. On an annual scale, BESS exhibited the best accuracy (2.50 vs 2.51 g C kg−1 H2O), followed by PML (2.49 g C kg−1 H2O), MODIS (2.03 g C kg−1 H2O) and GLASS (1.53 g C kg−1 H2O) models. Our evaluation underscores the potential of integrating carbon and water cycles into models to enhance WUE performance, thereby providing a direction for future improvements in model structures.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Agricultural Water Management
Published
2026-01-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2026.110179
Primary Topic
Plant Water Relations and Carbon Dynamics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Divergent performance of multiple satellite-based products for monitoring water use efficiency across diverse agroecosystems

Yanan Chen, Xuguang Tang, Jianguang Wen, Jiaoyue Wang et al.
Agricultural Water Management
Plant Water Relations and Carbon Dynamics
article

Divergent performance of multiple satellite-based products for monitoring water use efficiency across diverse agroecosystems

Yanan Chen, Xuguang Tang, Jianguang Wen, Jiaoyue Wang, Dongqiang Chen, Li Nong Yao
article en

Abstract

Multiple satellite remote sensing-based gross primary productivity (GPP) and evapotranspiration (ET) products have been developed to simulate the spatiotemporal patterns of carbon and water cycles in terrestrial ecosystems. However, the performance of these products in monitoring cropland water use efficiency (WUE) has rarely been evaluated. In this study, a total of 140 site-years of flux data across the maize, soybean, rice and winter wheat ecosystems were used as a benchmark to assess the performance of such products over 8-day, monthly and annual time scales, including the Breathing Earth System Simulator (BESS), Global Land Surface Satellite (GLASS), Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS), and the Penman-Monteith-Leuning V2 (PML), respectively. Our site-level evaluation demonstrated that the performance of such satellite-based products for monitoring WUE varied considerably across diverse agroecosystems. BESS WUE outperformed the other three products at all time scales when mixing all crop types together. However, the optimal product varied for specific crop across 8-day, monthly and yearly scales. At the 8-day scale, BESS performed best in simulating WUE for maize, while PML was superior for the other three crops. It indicated that the models that closely coupled carbon and water cycles tend to yield more robust WUE estimates. At the monthly scale, the BESS again provided the most accurate WUE for maize and soybean, whereas the PML product performed best for rice and winter wheat. Nevertheless, all products showed limitations, particularly in capturing the interannual variations of cropland WUE. On an annual scale, BESS exhibited the best accuracy (2.50 vs 2.51 g C kg−1 H2O), followed by PML (2.49 g C kg−1 H2O), MODIS (2.03 g C kg−1 H2O) and GLASS (1.53 g C kg−1 H2O) models. Our evaluation underscores the potential of integrating carbon and water cycles into models to enhance WUE performance, thereby providing a direction for future improvements in model structures.

Agricultural Water ManagementVol. 325
Clean water and sanitation
Openalex Percentile: Top 87%
Plant Water Relations and Carbon Dynamics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Divergent performance of multiple satellite-based products for monitoring water use efficiency across diverse agroecosystems — Yanan Chen, Xuguang Tang, et al. · Agricultural Water Management (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS