International student mobility and future migration aspirations and capabilities – a comparison between postgraduate students in medicine and social sciences and humanities

This study examines how international student mobility (ISM) shapes the future migration aspirations and capabilities of postgraduate students from Germany studying abroad in the fields of medicine and the social sciences and humanities (SSH). These two disciplines represent different expectations and levels of engagement with mobility, as well as different levels of professional orientation within their studies. This becomes relevant in cases where future migration is mainly aspired for professional development and work. Drawing on 69 in-depth interviews and using the aspirations-capabilities framework (ACF), the paper compares how students from these two disciplines conceptualise and navigate future migration – and how they utilise aspirations and capabilities born out of their field-specific experiences. Findings show that medical students, supported by clear career pathways and wider recognized qualifications, typically exhibit intrinsic aspirations toward future migration, motivated by curiosity, personal growth, and altruistic goals. Their strong professional capabilities afford them high positive freedom to migrate. In contrast, SSH students face structural uncertainties and more limited capabilities, leading to more instrumental aspirations where migration is contingent upon job availability. However, SSH students often reframe uncertainty and spatial flexibility as strengths, developing adaptive capabilities through their ISM experience. Despite disciplinary differences, all students reflect on constraints such as family, geopolitics, and institutional structures, revealing that future migration intentions arise from the dynamic interplay of imagined opportunities and real-life conditions. This study extends the ACF to the underexplored population of students and provides empirical insight into how ISM affects students’ long-term mobility trajectories across academic fields.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Comparative Migration Studies
Published
2026-01-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s40878-026-00522-x
Primary Topic
International Student and Expatriate Challenges
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

International student mobility and future migration aspirations and capabilities – a comparison between postgraduate students in medicine and social sciences and humanities

Gregor Schäfer
Comparative Migration Studies
International Student and Expatriate Challenges
article

International student mobility and future migration aspirations and capabilities – a comparison between postgraduate students in medicine and social sciences and humanities

Gregor Schäfer
article en

Abstract

This study examines how international student mobility (ISM) shapes the future migration aspirations and capabilities of postgraduate students from Germany studying abroad in the fields of medicine and the social sciences and humanities (SSH). These two disciplines represent different expectations and levels of engagement with mobility, as well as different levels of professional orientation within their studies. This becomes relevant in cases where future migration is mainly aspired for professional development and work. Drawing on 69 in-depth interviews and using the aspirations-capabilities framework (ACF), the paper compares how students from these two disciplines conceptualise and navigate future migration – and how they utilise aspirations and capabilities born out of their field-specific experiences. Findings show that medical students, supported by clear career pathways and wider recognized qualifications, typically exhibit intrinsic aspirations toward future migration, motivated by curiosity, personal growth, and altruistic goals. Their strong professional capabilities afford them high positive freedom to migrate. In contrast, SSH students face structural uncertainties and more limited capabilities, leading to more instrumental aspirations where migration is contingent upon job availability. However, SSH students often reframe uncertainty and spatial flexibility as strengths, developing adaptive capabilities through their ISM experience. Despite disciplinary differences, all students reflect on constraints such as family, geopolitics, and institutional structures, revealing that future migration intentions arise from the dynamic interplay of imagined opportunities and real-life conditions. This study extends the ACF to the underexplored population of students and provides empirical insight into how ISM affects students’ long-term mobility trajectories across academic fields.

Comparative Migration StudiesVol. 14(1)
University of Bath (GB)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 83%
International Student and Expatriate Challenges
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.