The significance of small lymph nodes on CT for advanced poorly cohesive gastric carcinoma

This study aims to assess the size of metastatic lymph nodes (LNs) in advanced poorly cohesive gastric carcinoma (PC-GC) on pre-operative CT and to evaluate potential differences based on histological types. We included advanced gastric cancer patients who underwent surgery at Chung-Ang University Hospital from February 2018 to May 2023. Two abdominal radiologists, in consensus, reviewed abdominal CT scans to evaluate the presence of gastric cancer and the largest size of visible LNs at each gastric LN station on CT scans. Measurable LNs were correlated with the full pathology report from electronic database records to determine the metastatic status. We used the independent t-test to evaluate the size difference of metastatic LNs across different histologic types. We evaluated a total of 136 patients (mean age, 67.25 ± 11.97; 91 males) with advanced gastric cancers. Among them, PC-GC was found in 26 patients (19.1%). Out of 427 measurable LNs, 216 were identified as malignant based on the pathology report. metastatic LNs in PC-GC were significantly smaller than metastatic LNs in other types of gastric cancer (p < 0.001, mean ± standard deviation, 6.226 ± 2.538 mm vs. 8.825 ± 5.598 mm). The best cut-off size of the metastatic LNs was 6 mm in PC-GC, as compared with 8 mm in other types of gastric cancers. The size of metastatic LNs in advanced PC-GCs is significantly smaller than metastatic LNs in other types of gastric cancer. Therefore, lowering the size threshold to 6 mm could enhance pre-operative CT evaluation of metastatic LNs in PC-GC.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Cancer Imaging
Published
2026-01-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s40644-026-00991-4
Primary Topic
Gastric Cancer Management and Outcomes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The significance of small lymph nodes on CT for advanced poorly cohesive gastric carcinoma

Hyun Ho Shin, Hyun Jeong Park, E. T. Lee, Hyun-wook Park et al.
Cancer Imaging
Gastric Cancer Management and Outcomes
article

The significance of small lymph nodes on CT for advanced poorly cohesive gastric carcinoma

Hyun Ho Shin, Hyun Jeong Park, E. T. Lee, Hyun-wook Park, Byung-Sun Kim, Jae-Yong Park, Jong Won Kim, Hee Sung Kim, Jae J. Kim, Gyeongme Cho
article en

Abstract

This study aims to assess the size of metastatic lymph nodes (LNs) in advanced poorly cohesive gastric carcinoma (PC-GC) on pre-operative CT and to evaluate potential differences based on histological types. We included advanced gastric cancer patients who underwent surgery at Chung-Ang University Hospital from February 2018 to May 2023. Two abdominal radiologists, in consensus, reviewed abdominal CT scans to evaluate the presence of gastric cancer and the largest size of visible LNs at each gastric LN station on CT scans. Measurable LNs were correlated with the full pathology report from electronic database records to determine the metastatic status. We used the independent t-test to evaluate the size difference of metastatic LNs across different histologic types. We evaluated a total of 136 patients (mean age, 67.25 ± 11.97; 91 males) with advanced gastric cancers. Among them, PC-GC was found in 26 patients (19.1%). Out of 427 measurable LNs, 216 were identified as malignant based on the pathology report. metastatic LNs in PC-GC were significantly smaller than metastatic LNs in other types of gastric cancer (p < 0.001, mean ± standard deviation, 6.226 ± 2.538 mm vs. 8.825 ± 5.598 mm). The best cut-off size of the metastatic LNs was 6 mm in PC-GC, as compared with 8 mm in other types of gastric cancers. The size of metastatic LNs in advanced PC-GCs is significantly smaller than metastatic LNs in other types of gastric cancer. Therefore, lowering the size threshold to 6 mm could enhance pre-operative CT evaluation of metastatic LNs in PC-GC.

Cancer ImagingVol. 26(1)
Chung-Ang University (KR)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 82%
Gastric Cancer Management and Outcomes
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.