Education, Employment, Income, and Urban–Rural Differences as Drivers of Social Inequalities in Environmental Exposures: Evidence from the UK Biobank

This study investigates the social patterning of environmental exposures, examining how three socioeconomic position dimensions influence exposure to air pollution, road traffic noise, and availability of green spaces, in both urban and rural areas in England, Scotland, and Wales. Using data from the UK Biobank cohort study, we assessed associations between three individual markers of socioeconomic position: educational attainment, household income, and employment status, and three environmental exposure domains: residential airborne pollutants, residential road traffic noise, and residential green and blue space. In urban areas, participants with lower educational attainment, lower household income, or those who were unemployed exhibit a higher exposure to airborne pollutants. Household income also influences the vicinity to green spaces and natural environments, with lower incomes experiencing less green and natural environments in both the rural and urban contexts. Retired individuals experienced lower exposure to airborne pollutants and lived in areas with more green spaces or natural environments compared with employed individuals. These patterns were consistent across England, Scotland, and Wales, although some geographical and national differences were observed. The study highlights the complex interplay among socioeconomic factors, geographical location, and environmental exposures. Our findings suggest that socioeconomic position is a key determinant of specific external exposomes, with socioeconomically disadvantaged groups experiencing more adverse environmental conditions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Environmental Science & Technology
Published
2026-01-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.5c08849
Primary Topic
Noise Effects and Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Education, Employment, Income, and Urban–Rural Differences as Drivers of Social Inequalities in Environmental Exposures: Evidence from the UK Biobank

Lola Neufcourt, Raphaële Castagné, David G. Tang, Rin Wada et al.
Environmental Science & Technology
Noise Effects and Management
article

Education, Employment, Income, and Urban–Rural Differences as Drivers of Social Inequalities in Environmental Exposures: Evidence from the UK Biobank

Lola Neufcourt, Raphaële Castagné, David G. Tang, Rin Wada, Cyrille Delpierre, Michelle Kelly-Irving, Ruben Colindres Zuehlke, Marc Chadeau-Hyam, Roel Vermeulen, Fernando Guntoro, Gauthier Pereira, Benoît Lepage, Kees de Hoogh
article en

Abstract

This study investigates the social patterning of environmental exposures, examining how three socioeconomic position dimensions influence exposure to air pollution, road traffic noise, and availability of green spaces, in both urban and rural areas in England, Scotland, and Wales. Using data from the UK Biobank cohort study, we assessed associations between three individual markers of socioeconomic position: educational attainment, household income, and employment status, and three environmental exposure domains: residential airborne pollutants, residential road traffic noise, and residential green and blue space. In urban areas, participants with lower educational attainment, lower household income, or those who were unemployed exhibit a higher exposure to airborne pollutants. Household income also influences the vicinity to green spaces and natural environments, with lower incomes experiencing less green and natural environments in both the rural and urban contexts. Retired individuals experienced lower exposure to airborne pollutants and lived in areas with more green spaces or natural environments compared with employed individuals. These patterns were consistent across England, Scotland, and Wales, although some geographical and national differences were observed. The study highlights the complex interplay among socioeconomic factors, geographical location, and environmental exposures. Our findings suggest that socioeconomic position is a key determinant of specific external exposomes, with socioeconomically disadvantaged groups experiencing more adverse environmental conditions.

Environmental Science & TechnologyVol. 60(4)
Inserm (FR), Swiss Tropical and Public Health Institute (CH), Université Fédérale de Toulouse Midi-Pyrénées (FR), University of Basel (CH), Utrecht University (NL), Federal Institute for Risk Assessment (DE), Centre de recherche en Epidémiologie et Santé des Populations (FR), Faculty of Public Health (GB), Imperial College London (GB)
No poverty
Openalex Percentile: Top 81%
Noise Effects and Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.