Psychological safety and team cooperation as drivers of dynamic capabilities and performance: a cross-national comparative study between Brazil and Germany

Abstract This study examines how psychological safety and team cooperation shape team dynamic capabilities and performance in organizations from Brazil and Germany. Data were collected from 84 teams ( n = 440) across four financial-sector companies. Using partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) and multigroup analysis (MGA), we validated a team-level dynamic capabilities scale adapted from Kump et al. (in Ind Corporate Change 1(24):1149, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1093/icc/dty054 ). Psychological safety positively affected cooperation in both countries, with stronger effects among German teams ( β B = 0.365; β G = 0.568). Psychological safety also influenced dynamic capabilities ( β B = 0.345; β G = 0.209), and cooperation further contributed to dynamic capabilities ( β B = 0.456; β G = 0.404). Dynamic capabilities predicted performance significantly only in Germany ( β B = 0.089, n.s.; β G = 0.271, p < 0.001). MGA confirmed significant cross-national differences in H2 and H4, indicating stronger behavioral and performance-related effects among German teams. Overall, the findings advance understanding of the behavioral foundations of team dynamic capabilities and offer practical insights for enhancing performance through psychologically safe and cooperative team environments.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Future Business Journal
Published
2026-01-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s43093-025-00721-5
Primary Topic
Occupational Health and Safety Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Psychological safety and team cooperation as drivers of dynamic capabilities and performance: a cross-national comparative study between Brazil and Germany

Deise Graziele Dickel, Luciana Santos Costa Vieira Da Silva, Gilnei Luiz de Moura, Wesley Vieira da Silva et al.
Future Business Journal
Occupational Health and Safety Research
article

Psychological safety and team cooperation as drivers of dynamic capabilities and performance: a cross-national comparative study between Brazil and Germany

Deise Graziele Dickel, Luciana Santos Costa Vieira Da Silva, Gilnei Luiz de Moura, Wesley Vieira da Silva, Luis Felipe Dias Lopes
article en

Abstract

Abstract This study examines how psychological safety and team cooperation shape team dynamic capabilities and performance in organizations from Brazil and Germany. Data were collected from 84 teams ( n = 440) across four financial-sector companies. Using partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) and multigroup analysis (MGA), we validated a team-level dynamic capabilities scale adapted from Kump et al. (in Ind Corporate Change 1(24):1149, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1093/icc/dty054 ). Psychological safety positively affected cooperation in both countries, with stronger effects among German teams ( β B = 0.365; β G = 0.568). Psychological safety also influenced dynamic capabilities ( β B = 0.345; β G = 0.209), and cooperation further contributed to dynamic capabilities ( β B = 0.456; β G = 0.404). Dynamic capabilities predicted performance significantly only in Germany ( β B = 0.089, n.s.; β G = 0.271, p < 0.001). MGA confirmed significant cross-national differences in H2 and H4, indicating stronger behavioral and performance-related effects among German teams. Overall, the findings advance understanding of the behavioral foundations of team dynamic capabilities and offer practical insights for enhancing performance through psychologically safe and cooperative team environments.

Future Business JournalVol. 12(1)
Universidade Federal de Santa Maria (BR), Instituto Federal Farroupilha (BR), Fundação Dom Cabral (BR), Universidade Federal de Alagoas (BR)
Partnerships for the goals
Openalex Percentile: Top 83%
Occupational Health and Safety Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.