Double-edged effects of work task stress on safety performance: a cognitive appraisal perspective

• Work task stress has double-edged effects on safety performance. • Challenge and hindrance appraisals mediate the work task stress–safety performance relationship. • Vocational identity weakens the work task stress–hindrance appraisal pathway. • No significant moderation of the stress–challenge appraisal pathway. In high-risk industries, enhancing employees’ safety performance remains a central concern for both practitioners and scholars. However, evidence on the effects of work task stress is inconsistent: some studies suggest that stress can motivate better safety performance, whereas others provide evidence that the accumulation of industry-inherent pressures and role demands undermines it. This debate underscores uncertainty about the mechanisms through which work task stress influences safety outcomes, particularly the role of cognitive appraisals. Building on cognitive appraisal theory and the job demands-resources (JD-R) model, we propose a dual-pathway mediation model in which work task stress influences safety compliance and safety participation through two competing appraisal processes. A field survey of 308 frontline employees in high-risk industries reveals that work task stress exhibits double-edged effects: it improves both safety compliance and safety participation through challenge appraisals while simultaneously diminishing them through hindrance appraisals. Moreover, vocational identity significantly attenuates the hindrance pathway but does not reliably enhance the positive effects of challenge appraisals. This research challenges the traditional either-or assumption of stress appraisals by adopting a dual-pathway framework, which offers a new lens for explaining the mechanisms linking stress to safety performance in safety critical contexts. Simultaneously, the asymmetric moderating effect of vocational identity enriches theoretical understanding of the distinct functions of personal resources in the JD-R model.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Safety Science
Published
2026-01-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2026.107120
Primary Topic
Occupational Health and Safety Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Double-edged effects of work task stress on safety performance: a cognitive appraisal perspective

Bolin Wang, Zhiqiang Wang, Sihua Chen, Yuanyuan Lai et al.
Safety Science
Occupational Health and Safety Research
article

Double-edged effects of work task stress on safety performance: a cognitive appraisal perspective

Bolin Wang, Zhiqiang Wang, Sihua Chen, Yuanyuan Lai, Gantao Li
article en

Abstract

• Work task stress has double-edged effects on safety performance. • Challenge and hindrance appraisals mediate the work task stress–safety performance relationship. • Vocational identity weakens the work task stress–hindrance appraisal pathway. • No significant moderation of the stress–challenge appraisal pathway. In high-risk industries, enhancing employees’ safety performance remains a central concern for both practitioners and scholars. However, evidence on the effects of work task stress is inconsistent: some studies suggest that stress can motivate better safety performance, whereas others provide evidence that the accumulation of industry-inherent pressures and role demands undermines it. This debate underscores uncertainty about the mechanisms through which work task stress influences safety outcomes, particularly the role of cognitive appraisals. Building on cognitive appraisal theory and the job demands-resources (JD-R) model, we propose a dual-pathway mediation model in which work task stress influences safety compliance and safety participation through two competing appraisal processes. A field survey of 308 frontline employees in high-risk industries reveals that work task stress exhibits double-edged effects: it improves both safety compliance and safety participation through challenge appraisals while simultaneously diminishing them through hindrance appraisals. Moreover, vocational identity significantly attenuates the hindrance pathway but does not reliably enhance the positive effects of challenge appraisals. This research challenges the traditional either-or assumption of stress appraisals by adopting a dual-pathway framework, which offers a new lens for explaining the mechanisms linking stress to safety performance in safety critical contexts. Simultaneously, the asymmetric moderating effect of vocational identity enriches theoretical understanding of the distinct functions of personal resources in the JD-R model.

Safety ScienceVol. 197
Jiangxi Provincial Department of Science and Technology (CN), China Railway Group (China) (CN), Institute of New Materials (CN), Jiangxi University of Finance and Economics (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 84%
Occupational Health and Safety Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.