Early graft failure after adult living donor liver transplantation: A multicenter risk analysis and development of the early allograft failure in living donor liver transplantation (EAGLE-LDLT) model

Early allograft failure (EAF) after living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) remains a clinical challenge. Existing prediction models developed for deceased donor transplantation poorly apply to LDLT due to distinct surgical and physiological factors. This study identifies clinical determinants of EAF and develops an LDLT-specific prediction model. We conducted a multicenter retrospective cohort study from 17 high-volume LDLT centers (January 2016-December 2020) with external validation at a tertiary center in Saudi Arabia (January 2015-December 2022). The primary outcome was EAF (graft loss or patient death ≤90 d). Multivariable mixed-effects logistic regression identified preoperative/intraoperative risk factors. The EAGLE-LDLT model was constructed using postoperative laboratory values. Performance was compared against established models (EAD, MEAF, A2ALL) using ROC analysis and decision curve analysis. The development cohort included 2944 adult LDLT recipients (67.7% male; median age 55 y; median MELD 14) with a 5.5% EAF rate. External validation included 1020 recipients (median MELD 21, 6.7% EAF). Independent risk factors for EAF were MELD (OR 1.06, 95% CI 1.04-1.08), donor BMI (OR 1.05, 95% CI 1.00-1.10), portal vein thrombosis (OR 1.73, 95% CI 1.13-2.63), and hepaticojejunostomy (OR 1.58, 95% CI 1.06-2.36). The EAGLE-LDLT model incorporating peak ALT (>468 U/L), peak INR (>1.9), and bilirubin (>3.5 mg/dL) and INR (>1.3) at POD7, demonstrated superior discrimination (AUC=0.81) compared with MEAF (AUC=0.77, p =0.004), EAD (AUC=0.67, p <0.001), and A2ALL (AUC=0.65, p <0.001). EAGLE-LDLT achieved balanced sensitivity (75.0%) and specificity (73.7%), effectively stratifying patients into high-risk (15% of patients; 40.4% EAF incidence) and low-risk groups. Preoperative and intraoperative clinical factors predict EAF in LDLT. The EAGLE-LDLT model accurately identifies LDLT recipients at the highest risk for EAF postoperatively.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Liver Transplantation
Published
2026-01-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1097/lvt.0000000000000816
Primary Topic
Organ Transplantation Techniques and Outcomes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Early graft failure after adult living donor liver transplantation: A multicenter risk analysis and development of the early allograft failure in living donor liver transplantation (EAGLE-LDLT) model

Michele Finotti, Jongman KIM, Elvan Onur Kırımker, Lara Genedy et al.
Liver Transplantation
Organ Transplantation Techniques and Outcomes
article

Early graft failure after adult living donor liver transplantation: A multicenter risk analysis and development of the early allograft failure in living donor liver transplantation (EAGLE-LDLT) model

Michele Finotti, Jongman KIM, Elvan Onur Kırımker, Lara Genedy, Kim Olthoff, J. Emond, Benjamin Samstein, Glenn Kunnath Bonney, I Lun Chen, Kris Ann Hervera Marquez, Wojciech G. Polak, Philipp Dutkowski, D. Balci, Leonardo Centonze, Tiffany CL Wong, Mohamed Rela, Suyoung Hong, Ashwin Rammohan, Kyung-Suk Suh, G. Sapisochin, Marcus Yeow, Jae-Won Joh, Zhihao Li, Dieter Broering, Markus U Boehnert, Shih-Chao Hsu, Abhishek Mathur, Giuliano Testa, Silvio Nadalin, Nobuhisa Akamatsu, Nazia Selzner, Chao-Long Chen, Pierre-Alain Clavien, Dimitri Raptis, Mark Cattral, Oren Shaked, Vasanthakumar Gunasekaran, Timucin Taner, Long-Bin Jeng, Kiyoshi Hasegawa, Julie K Heimbach
article en

Abstract

Early allograft failure (EAF) after living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) remains a clinical challenge. Existing prediction models developed for deceased donor transplantation poorly apply to LDLT due to distinct surgical and physiological factors. This study identifies clinical determinants of EAF and develops an LDLT-specific prediction model. We conducted a multicenter retrospective cohort study from 17 high-volume LDLT centers (January 2016-December 2020) with external validation at a tertiary center in Saudi Arabia (January 2015-December 2022). The primary outcome was EAF (graft loss or patient death ≤90 d). Multivariable mixed-effects logistic regression identified preoperative/intraoperative risk factors. The EAGLE-LDLT model was constructed using postoperative laboratory values. Performance was compared against established models (EAD, MEAF, A2ALL) using ROC analysis and decision curve analysis. The development cohort included 2944 adult LDLT recipients (67.7% male; median age 55 y; median MELD 14) with a 5.5% EAF rate. External validation included 1020 recipients (median MELD 21, 6.7% EAF). Independent risk factors for EAF were MELD (OR 1.06, 95% CI 1.04-1.08), donor BMI (OR 1.05, 95% CI 1.00-1.10), portal vein thrombosis (OR 1.73, 95% CI 1.13-2.63), and hepaticojejunostomy (OR 1.58, 95% CI 1.06-2.36). The EAGLE-LDLT model incorporating peak ALT (>468 U/L), peak INR (>1.9), and bilirubin (>3.5 mg/dL) and INR (>1.3) at POD7, demonstrated superior discrimination (AUC=0.81) compared with MEAF (AUC=0.77, p =0.004), EAD (AUC=0.67, p <0.001), and A2ALL (AUC=0.65, p <0.001). EAGLE-LDLT achieved balanced sensitivity (75.0%) and specificity (73.7%), effectively stratifying patients into high-risk (15% of patients; 40.4% EAF incidence) and low-risk groups. Preoperative and intraoperative clinical factors predict EAF in LDLT. The EAGLE-LDLT model accurately identifies LDLT recipients at the highest risk for EAF postoperatively.

Liver Transplantation
University of Modena and Reggio Emilia (IT), University Health Network (CA), Mayo Clinic (US), Seoul National University (KR), Ankara University (TR), Oregon Health & Science University (US), Chinese University of Hong Kong (HK), China Medical University (TW), University of Toronto (CA), University of Zurich (CH), Columbia University Irving Medical Center (US), Tamil Nadu Dr. M.G.R. Medical University (IN), King Faisal Specialist Hospital & Research Centre (SA), Samsung Medical Center (KR), Baylor University Medical Center (US), WinnMed (US), University Hospital of Basel (CH), Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital (TW), Azienda Socio Sanitaria Territoriale Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda (IT), China Medical University Hospital (TW), National University Health System (SG), The University of Tokyo (JP), University of Pennsylvania (US), University of Tübingen (DE), University of Hong Kong (HK), Rotterdam University of Applied Sciences (NL)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 81%
Organ Transplantation Techniques and Outcomes
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.